Thanks Mickael and Jonathon for reporting the problem with the javdocs. The
links should be fixed now.

-Jason

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Jonathan Bond <jb...@netflix.com.invalid>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm having a problem with the new website.  Whenever I try to follow a link
> to the Kafka javadoc, either from within the website or a google link - it
> always takes me to the top of the Kafka 0.10 documentation page.  I can't
> figure out how to get to the javadoc.
>
> Thanks, Jonathan
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 6:46 PM Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > Huge improvement. Thanks Derrick and Gwen!
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Much fancier now :)
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Ali Akhtar <ali.rac...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Just noticed this on pulling up the documentation. Oh yeah! This new
> > look
> > > > is fantastic.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Vahid S Hashemian <
> > > > vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com
> > > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you for the much needed new design.
> > > > > At first glance, it looks great, and more professional.
> > > > >
> > > > > --Vahid
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > From:   Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io>
> > > > > To:     d...@kafka.apache.org, Users <users@kafka.apache.org>
> > > > > Cc:     Derrick Or <derr...@confluent.io>
> > > > > Date:   10/04/2016 04:13 PM
> > > > > Subject:        Snazzy new look to our website
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Team Kafka,
> > > > >
> > > > > I just merged PR 20 to our website - which gives it a new (and IMO
> > > > > pretty snazzy) look and feel. Thanks to Derrick Or for contributing
> > > > > the update.
> > > > >
> > > > > I had to do a hard-refresh (shift-f5 on my mac) to get the new look
> > to
> > > > > load properly - so if stuff looks off, try it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Comments and contributions to the site are welcome.
> > > > >
> > > > > Gwen
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to