-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Kafka 0.10.1.0 which was release last week does contain the fix already. The fix will be in CP 3.1 coming up soon!
(sorry that I did mix up versions in a previous email) - -Matthias On 10/23/16 12:10 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote: > So if I get it right I will not have this fix until 4 months? > Should I just create my own example with the next version of > Kafka? > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Matthias J. Sax > <matth...@confluent.io> wrote: > > Current version is 3.0.1 CP 3.1 should be release the next weeks > > So CP 3.2 should be there is about 4 month (Kafka follows a time > base release cycle of 4 month and CP usually aligns with Kafka > releases) > > -Matthias > > > On 10/20/16 5:10 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote: >>>> Any idea of when 3.2 is coming? >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Matthias J. Sax >>>> <matth...@confluent.io> wrote: >>>> >>>> No problem. Asking questions is the purpose of mailing lists. >>>> :) >>>> >>>> The issue will be fixed in next version of examples branch. >>>> >>>> Examples branch is build with CP dependency and not with >>>> Kafka dependency. CP-3.2 is not available yet; only Kafka >>>> 0.10.1.0. Nevertheless, they should work with Kafka >>>> dependency, too. I never tried it, but you should give it a >>>> shot... >>>> >>>> But you should use example master branch because of API >>>> changes from 0.10.0.x to 0.10.1 (and thus, changing CP-3.1 to >>>> 0.10.1.0 will not be compatible and not compile, while >>>> changing CP-3.2-SNAPSHOT to 0.10.1.0 should work -- hopefully >>>> ;) ) >>>> >>>> >>>> -Matthias >>>> >>>> On 10/20/16 4:02 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote: >>>>>>> So this issue I am seeing is fixed in the next version >>>>>>> of example branch? Can I change my pom to point it the >>>>>>> higher version of Kafka if that is the issue? Or do I >>>>>>> need to wait until new branch is made available? Sorry >>>>>>> lot of questions :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Matthias J. Sax >>>>>>> <matth...@confluent.io> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The branch is 0.10.0.1 and not 0.10.1.0 (sorry for so >>>>>>> many zeros and ones -- super easy to mix up) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> However, examples master branch uses CP-3.1-SNAPSHOT >>>>>>> (ie, Kafka 0.10.1.0) -- there will be a 0.10.1 examples >>>>>>> branch, after CP-3.1 was released >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Matthias >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 10/20/16 3:48 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote: >>>>>>>>>> I just now cloned this repo. It seems to be using >>>>>>>>>> 10.1 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/confluentinc/examples and >>>>>>>>>> running examples in >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/confluentinc/examples/tree/kafka-0.10.0.1- cp- > >>>>>>>>>> 3.0 >>>> >>>>>>>>>> > .1/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> kafka-streams >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Michael Noll >>>>>>>>>> <mich...@confluent.io> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I suspect you are running Kafka 0.10.0.x on >>>>>>>>>>> Windows? If so, this is a known issue that is >>>>>>>>>>> fixed in Kafka 0.10.1 that was just released >>>>>>>>>>> today. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Also: which examples are you referring to? >>>>>>>>>>> And, to confirm: which git branch / Kafka >>>>>>>>>>> version / OS in case my guess above was wrong. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, October 20, 2016, Mohit Anchlia >>>>>>>>>>> <mohitanch...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I am trying to run the examples from git. >>>>>>>>>>>> While running the wordcount example I see >>>>>>>>>>>> this error: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: *java.lang.RuntimeException*: >>>>>>>>>>>> librocksdbjni-win64.dll was not found inside >>>>>>>>>>>> JAR. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Am I expected to include this jar locally? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- *Michael G. Noll* Product Manager | >>>>>>>>>>> Confluent +1 650 453 5860 | @miguno >>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/miguno> Follow us: Twitter >>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc> | Blog >>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.confluent.io/blog> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJYDbOJAAoJECnhiMLycopPSF0QAKFi0lG3dMccIaBuSzsgj2Of Iu9BnoTCr4MJoY18loPE8DUy9kbEjaf6RjMzkvXvTV+Jjys7PgTa5qLlo7hEwgb6 UxWZYrdOXUGQcJckmsdzMIoGY79GETQuvRkN8uzJ/hfJJ4YNgtLCXaNMDTfcRmtp hson3M7SYRISSz7Jz9jM7PmPnR6MIWXRV+8r9jdL8IH+gRtrnT1svr/pkiAL6e7B gZdQHhTVI+dqWRgHfuenr2MQH2Od3UgZsK3pqVlfv0Zy7c3IL6FKN4WQgDiYOYBH URPY9BBQGnOTINEmX63Bwx8ns+RNgtyIO9O3ytewRmyWRkQIzO/K0zszSjblPJeG rNnrC9wAQH9arx6ZHAw/moEfpsRCAJT5SGjCnYa8NaDq0wlbHM+lb/AWge2q9C8N /op4pBImyxpqbWVNjUhWwGoGAqTliXqs4QlyuBi0KhIKXYwsXELthillnDNGbhnA ZRxcGOfA3CS2qb+GiwmsxKSLcTXq9U7RlNmCLmW0+Xbg/98CQGSKPMMzG7lkgK2v d8SmN8dafa0yiXmf/CtdMGCRScNyLVtS5XLrQRyG3kXWSlNlxcjFMQGbuidFMIdv JLRiF4FGv6zjWSWmP7L75vyZQ+yVApvk2XDX00wT/hHIFC2SE2GYWB0usLMAw8/K jjWAQ1QCKsuW+ZzSkD7D =DMlr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
