Java consumer. 0.9.1

Thanks
Achintya

-----Original Message-----
From: Guozhang Wang [mailto:wangg...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 8:28 PM
To: users@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: Kafka consumers are not equally distributed

Which version of Kafka are you using with your consumer? Is it Scala or Java 
consumers?


Guozhang


On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Ghosh, Achintya (Contractor) < 
achintya_gh...@comcast.com> wrote:

> No, that is not the reason. Initially all the partitions were assigned 
> the messages and those were processed very fast and sit idle even 
> other partitions  are having a lot of messages to be processed.
> So I was under impression  that rebalance should be triggered and 
> messages will be re-distributed equally again.
>
> Thanks
> Achintya
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sharninder [mailto:sharnin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 12:33 AM
> To: users@kafka.apache.org
> Cc: d...@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Kafka consumers are not equally distributed
>
> Could it be because of the partition key ?
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Ghosh, Achintya (Contractor) < 
> achintya_gh...@comcast.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > We are doing the load test in Kafka with 25tps and first 9 hours it 
> > went fine almost 80K/hr messages were processed after that we see a 
> > lot of lags and we stopped the incoming load.
> >
> > Currently we see 15K/hr messages are processing. We have 40 consumer 
> > instances with concurrency 4 and 2 topics and both is having 160 
> > partitions so each consumer with each partition.
> >
> > What we found that some of the partitions are sitting idle and some 
> > of are overloaded and its really slowing down the consumer message
> processing.
> >
> > Why rebalancing is not happening and existing messages are not 
> > distributed equally among the instances? We tried to restart the app 
> > still the same pace. Any idea what could be the reason?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Achintya
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> --
> Sharninder
>



--
-- Guozhang

Reply via email to