Thanks Matthias.

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:55 AM Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io>
wrote:

> Calling `consumer.subscribe()` is a local call. Only when you call
> `consumer.poll()` the consumer will connect to the broker to get its
> assignment. Thus, it's save to call `poll()` directly.
>
> `assignment()` will return the assignment only after the first `poll()`
> call.
>
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 1/23/19 9:00 AM, chinchu chinchu wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I  have subscribed to a kafka topic  as below . I need to run some logic
> > only after the consumer has been assigned a partition .How ever
> > consumer.assignment() comes back as an empty set no matter  how long I
> wait
> > . If I do not have the while loop and then do a  consumer.poll() I do get
> > the records from the topic.Can any one tell me why this is  happening ?
> >
> > consumer.subscribe(topics);
> >       consumer.
> >
> >       Set<TopicPartition> assigned=Collections.emptySet();
> >       while(isAssigned)
> > {
> >                       assigned = consumer.assignment();
> >                      if(!assigned.isEmpty()) {
> >                    isAssigned= false;
> >                            }
> >    }
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:14 PM chinchu chinchu <chinchutec...@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >> I  have subscribed to a kafka topic  as below . I need to run some logic
> >> only after the consumer has been assigned a partition .How ever
> >> consumer.assignment() comes back as an empty set no matter  how long I
> wait
> >> . If I do not have the while loop and then do a  consumer.poll() I do
> get
> >> the records from the topic.Can any one tell me why this is  happening ?
> >>
> >> consumer.subscribe(topics);
> >>       consumer.
> >>
> >>       Set<TopicPartition> assigned=Collections.emptySet();
> >>       while(isAssigned)
> >> {
> >>                       assigned = consumer.assignment();
> >>                      if(!assigned.isEmpty()) {
> >>                   isAssigned= false;
> >>                            }
> >>    }
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Chinchu
> >>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to