Hi Pieter, FWIW, you may have encountered the following bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12671 .
Thanks, Alexandre Le ven. 12 juin 2020 à 00:43, D C <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Hey peeps, > > Anyone else encountered this and got to the bottom of it? > > I'm facing a similar issue, having LSO stuck for some partitions in a topic > and the consumers can't get data out of it (we're using read_committed = > true). > > When this issue started happening we were on kafka 2.3.1 > i tried: > - restarting the consumers > - deleting the partition from the leader and letting it get in sync with > the new leader > - rolling restart of the brokers > - shutting down the whole cluster and starting it again > - tried deleting the txnindex files (after backing them up) and restarting > the brokers > - tried putting down the follower brokers of a partition and resyncing that > partition on them from scratch > - upgraded both kafka broker and client to 2.5.0 > > Now the following questions arise: > Where is the LSO actually stored (even if you get rid of the txnfiles, the > LSO stays the same). > Is there any way that the LSO can be reset? > Is there any way that you can manually abort and clean the state of a stuck > transaction? (i suspect that this is the reason why the LSO is stuck) > Is there any way to manually trigger a consistency check on the logfiles > that would fix any existing issues with either the logs or the indexes in > the partition? > > Cheers, > Dragos > > On 2019/11/20 13:26:54, Pieter Hameete <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > after having some Broker issues (too many open files) we managed to recover > > our Brokers, but read_committed consumers are stuck for a specific topic > > partition. It seems like the LSO is stuck at a specific offset. The > > transactional producer for the topic partition is working without errors so > > the latest offset is incrementing correctly and so is transactional > > producing. > > > > What could be wrong here? And how can we get this specific LSO to be > > increment again? > > > > Thank you in advance for any advice. > > > > Best, > > > > Pieter > >
