Thanks Ed.

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 2:21 PM Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> In general you can delete log4j1.jar
> Replace with log4jcore_2.17.1.jar
> And log4japi_2.17.1.jar
>
> Ed
>
> On Monday, January 24, 2022, Men Lim <zulu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Is there a write out of the steps that need to be taken?
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 10:36 AM Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Explained in another thread log4j api is separate from implementation.
> > Its
> > > possible to remove log4j 1.2 jars from classpath and upgrade to log4j
> > > 2.17.1 without changing a line of code in kafka.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Monday, January 10, 2022, Tauzell, Dave <
> dave.tauz...@surescripts.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks.  Those KIPs show that there is a fair amount of work for
> this.
> > > >
> > > > From: Israel Ekpo <israele...@gmail.com>
> > > > Date: Monday, January 10, 2022 at 9:32 AM
> > > > To: users@kafka.apache.org <users@kafka.apache.org>
> > > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Log4j 1.2
> > > > There are two KIPs already related to this effort
> > > >
> > > > KIP-653
> > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > > confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-653*3A*Upgrade*log4j*to*
> > > > log4j2__;JSsrKys!!K_cMf-SQz-o!L-WI4wlYZXr-uPSEVkCzLZonJXmNKveV-
> > > > 8HJxhQCFXxP5ZBkw7oE0I-dphlW1fQiwF2wVQ$<
> > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/
> > > > cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-653*3A*
> > > > Upgrade*log4j*to*log4j2__;JSsrKys!!K_cMf-SQz-o!L-WI4wlYZXr-
> > > > uPSEVkCzLZonJXmNKveV-8HJxhQCFXxP5ZBkw7oE0I-dphlW1fQiwF2wVQ$>
> > > >
> > > > KIP-676
> > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > > confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-676*3A*Respect*logging*
> > > > hierarchy__;JSsrKw!!K_cMf-SQz-o!L-WI4wlYZXr-uPSEVkCzLZonJXmNKveV-
> > > > 8HJxhQCFXxP5ZBkw7oE0I-dphlW1fQF_CNUlw$<
> > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/
> > > > cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-676*3A*
> > > > Respect*logging*hierarchy__;JSsrKw!!K_cMf-SQz-o!L-WI4wlYZXr-
> > > > uPSEVkCzLZonJXmNKveV-8HJxhQCFXxP5ZBkw7oE0I-dphlW1fQF_CNUlw$>
> > > >
> > > > I believe the work is in progress, feel free to reach out to the
> > > > contributors if you are able to contribute to the effort by coding,
> > > > reviewing PRs, submitting documentation etc
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Israel Ekpo
> > > > Lead Instructor, IzzyAcademy.com
> > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.youtube.com/c/
> > > > izzyacademy__;!!K_cMf-SQz-o!L-WI4wlYZXr-uPSEVkCzLZonJXmNKveV-
> > > > 8HJxhQCFXxP5ZBkw7oE0I-dphlW1fTVljfFMg$<
> > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/
> > > > www.youtube.com/c/izzyacademy__;!!K_cMf-SQz-o!L-WI4wlYZXr-
> > > > uPSEVkCzLZonJXmNKveV-8HJxhQCFXxP5ZBkw7oE0I-dphlW1fTVljfFMg$>
> > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://izzyacademy.com/__;!!
> > > > K_cMf-SQz-o!L-WI4wlYZXr-uPSEVkCzLZonJXmNKveV-8HJxhQCFXxP5ZBkw7oE0I-
> > > > dphlW1fQ3lp3_fQ$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/
> > > > izzyacademy.com/__;!!K_cMf-SQz-o!L-WI4wlYZXr-uPSEVkCzLZonJXmNKveV-
> > > > 8HJxhQCFXxP5ZBkw7oE0I-dphlW1fQ3lp3_fQ$>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 10:12 AM Brosy, Franziska <
> > > > franziska.br...@wido.bv.aok.de> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Well. Hopefully there is someone who is able and willingly to do
> that
> > > > > work.
> > > > > I'm so sorry that I can't help.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards
> > > > > Franziska
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > > > Von: Tauzell, Dave <dave.tauz...@surescripts.com>
> > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 10. Januar 2022 14:30
> > > > > An: users@kafka.apache.org
> > > > > Betreff: Re: Log4j 1.2
> > > > >
> > > > > Log4j 2.x isn't a drop-in replacement for 1.x.   It isn't a
> difficult
> > > > > change but somebody does need to go through all the source code and
> > do
> > > > the
> > > > > work.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -Dave
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Brosy, Franziska <franziska.br...@wido.bv.aok.de>
> > > > > Date: Monday, January 10, 2022 at 3:16 AM
> > > > > To: users@kafka.apache.org <users@kafka.apache.org>
> > > > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] AW: Log4j 1.2
> > > > > Hi Roger,
> > > > >
> > > > > maybe I wasn't clear enough. I'm not using kafka by myself. I'm
> > > customer
> > > > > of the MicroStrategy Plattform. MicroStrategy uses Kafka. Here is
> the
> > > > > problem. An old Log4j 1.2 is delivered with kafka.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.apache.org/dyn/
> > > >
> closer.cgi?path=*kafka*3.0.0*kafka_2.13-3.0.0.tgz__;Ly8v!!K_cMf-SQz-o!
> > > > LrFhvuhmLy3pfMBGcljRQDNs7bR9WN7rnggwu3lskqPDIWy8R-
> > xYG0aDEMAezzMT0F_bmQ$<
> > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi?
> > > > path=*kafka*3.0.0*kafka_2.13-3.0.0.tgz__;Ly8v!!K_cMf-SQz-o!
> > > > LrFhvuhmLy3pfMBGcljRQDNs7bR9WN7rnggwu3lskqPDIWy8R-
> > xYG0aDEMAezzMT0F_bmQ$>
> > > > > <
> > > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.apache.org/dyn/
> > > >
> closer.cgi?path=*kafka*3.0.0*kafka_2.13-3.0.0.tgz__;Ly8v!!K_cMf-SQz-o!
> > > > LrFhvuhmLy3pfMBGcljRQDNs7bR9WN7rnggwu3lskqPDIWy8R-
> > xYG0aDEMAezzMT0F_bmQ$
> > > > > >
> > > > > kafka_2.13-3.0.0\libs\log4j-1.2.17.jar
> > > > >
> > > > > Your advice to cve-2021-44228 is outdated. It is solved in Log4j
> > 2.17!
> > > > > So why is kafka delivered with Log4j 1.2 instead of Log4j 2.17??
> > > > >
> > > > > Stick to a very old version is definitely not secure! Yes, you can
> > use
> > > a
> > > > > smartphone with Android 4.2 but you wouldn't expect there is an
> > > emergency
> > > > > to do so - would you?
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you please tell me when kafka will be upgraded to Log4j at
> least
> > > > 2.17?
> > > > > Otherwise can you please tell me what's the reason to stick to such
> > an
> > > > old
> > > > > Log4j version and run into security risks?
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards
> > > > > Franziska
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > > > Von: Murilo Tavares <murilo...@gmail.com>
> > > > > Gesendet: Freitag, 7. Januar 2022 20:23
> > > > > An: users@kafka.apache.org
> > > > > Betreff: Re: Log4j 1.2
> > > > >
> > > > > Also worth mentioning the Kafka community has released this
> official
> > > > > announcement:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://kafka.apache.org/cve-
> > > > list__;!!K_cMf-SQz-o!LrFhvuhmLy3pfMBGcljRQDNs7bR9WN
> > 7rnggwu3lskqPDIWy8R-
> > > > xYG0aDEMAezzNwaYQJzA$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/
> > > > kafka.apache.org/cve-list__;!!K_cMf-SQz-o!
> > LrFhvuhmLy3pfMBGcljRQDNs7bR9WN
> > > > 7rnggwu3lskqPDIWy8R-xYG0aDEMAezzNwaYQJzA$>
> > > > > <
> > > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/kafka.apache.org/cve-
> > > > list__;!!K_cMf-SQz-o!LrFhvuhmLy3pfMBGcljRQDNs7bR9WN
> > 7rnggwu3lskqPDIWy8R-
> > > > xYG0aDEMAezzNwaYQJzA$
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 09:28, Roger Kasinsky <
> > roger.kasin...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Franziska,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When upgrading to Log4J 2.x.x, take extra care not to upgrade to
> a
> > > > > > 2.x.x version that has a more recent serious security flaw, much
> > > worse
> > > > > > than the one you mentioned. You can read more about it here:
> > > > > >
> > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve
> > > > <
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve
> > >
> > > > > >
> > > -2021-44228__;!!K_cMf-SQz-o!LrFhvuhmLy3pfMBGcljRQDNs7bR9WN7rnggwu3lskq
> > > > > > PDIWy8R-xYG0aDEMAezzM4gV-mDw$<
> > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/acces
> > > > > >
> > > s.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2021-44228__;!!K_cMf-SQz-o!LrFhvuhmLy3pf
> > > > > > MBGcljRQDNs7bR9WN7rnggwu3lskqPDIWy8R-xYG0aDEMAezzM4gV-mDw$>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -R
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 10:26 AM Brosy, Franziska <
> > > > > > franziska.br...@wido.bv.aok.de> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > can you please tell us why Kafka is still using Log4j 1.2? And
> > when
> > > > > > > it is planned to upgrade the Log4j version??
> > > > > > > Do you know this security vulnerability?:
> > > > > > >
> > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/__<
> > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/__>;
> > > > > > >
> > > !!K_cMf-SQz-o!LrFhvuhmLy3pfMBGcljRQDNs7bR9WN7rnggwu3lskqPDIWy8R-xYG0
> > > > > > > aDEMAezzOOQFfqlA$<
> > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/logging.apache.
> > > > > > >
> > > org/log4j/1.2/__;!!K_cMf-SQz-o!LrFhvuhmLy3pfMBGcljRQDNs7bR9WN7rnggwu
> > > > > > > 3lskqPDIWy8R-xYG0aDEMAezzOOQFfqlA$>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > A security vulnerability, CVE-2019-17571<
> > > > > > >
> > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2019-
> > > > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2019-
> >
> > > > > > >
> > > 17571/__;!!K_cMf-SQz-o!LrFhvuhmLy3pfMBGcljRQDNs7bR9WN7rnggwu3lskqPDI
> > > > > > > Wy8R-xYG0aDEMAezzNT4lvIFw$<
> > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.cv
> > > > > > >
> > > edetails.com/cve/CVE-2019-17571/__;!!K_cMf-SQz-o!LrFhvuhmLy3pfMBGclj
> > > > > > > RQDNs7bR9WN7rnggwu3lskqPDIWy8R-xYG0aDEMAezzNT4lvIFw$> > has
> been
> > > > > > > identified against Log4j 1. Log4j includes a SocketServer that
> > > > > > > accepts serialized
> > > > > > log
> > > > > > > events and deserializes them without verifying whether the
> > objects
> > > > > > > are allowed or not. This can provide an attack vector that can
> be
> > > > > expoited.
> > > > > > > Since Log4j 1 is no longer maintained this issue will not be
> > fixed.
> > > > > > > Users are urged to upgrade to Log4j 2.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best regards
> > > > > > > Franziska
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may
> > > > > contain sensitive information, and are intended solely for the use
> of
> > > the
> > > > > individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have
> received
> > > > this
> > > > > e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail
> immediately
> > > and
> > > > > destroy all copies of the e-mail and any attachments.
> > > > >
> > > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may
> > > > contain sensitive information, and are intended solely for the use of
> > the
> > > > individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received
> > > this
> > > > e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail immediately
> > and
> > > > destroy all copies of the e-mail and any attachments.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sorry this was sent from mobile. Will do less grammar and spell check
> > than
> > > usual.
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Sorry this was sent from mobile. Will do less grammar and spell check than
> usual.
>

Reply via email to