-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 30 June 2002 13:49, GeeK. wrote:
> Hi list,
> After trying kannel at 6 different machines, I've found out that kannel is
> quite messy with initializing a serial port.
> [modem TC-35 Siemens].
> Under Solaris this is quite a tricky to achieve, and under linux it is
> little bit easier (minicom trick).
This is a known problem with the AT2 driver, and a work-around is documented
in the STATUS file of the latest CVS, as well as the 1.2 release when it
comes.
> Another strange thing is that 1.1.6 is not working with "at2" smsc, but
> with old "at" it is working....
I had that impression two, that the AT code opens the drivers somewhat
differently and so works around several of the AT2 problems. all the same,
the AT2 code is much more mature and stable in other aspects and contains
many improvments.
> If I use old "at" under Solaris, then it works, but receiving messages is
> not possible.
> I think this is problem with init strings...
> For TC-35 it needs to be first:
> AT+CSMS=1 , and then this one will work...
> AT+CNMI=3,2,0,0,1
> otherwise I get error with AT+CNMI command, since without CSMS=1 , TC-35
> does not accept anthying else than AT+CNMI=1,2,0,0,1 (not 100%, this is
> from head). Anyway, after making kannel "work" after couple of inits and
> shutdowns, problem with initializing is occuring again after rebooting
> machine... Does anybody know solution for this?
> I've tried even setting up a port with "stty", but this is still not 100%
> reliable.
It is 100% reliable for me. if its not for you, the I suggest you find out why
and fix it (or tell us and we'll try to fix it :-).
Changing the modem init lines is not possible in AT w/o recompiling the code,
but it is possible in AT2 by changing modems.conf
>
> Second issue is unified-prefix...
> I've tested kannel 1.1.6 with 4 different cards (german) and when sending
> messages i need to enter diffferent numbers to be able to send SMS.
> For some it is ok to write 491742xxxxx, but for some of them I need to
> write 00491742xxxx
> my unified-prefix look's like: unified-prefix = "+491,00491;+,00"
> so...what I'm missing here? :-)
the translation is done from right to left, so writing 00941* will be
converted to +491* while writing 491* will not get translate to anything.
- --
Oded Arbel
m-Wise mobile solutions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-9-9581711
+972-67-340014
::..
Griffin :"I was just thinking what an interesting concept it is to eliminate
the
writer from the artistic process. If we could just get rid of these actors
and directors, maybe we've got something here."
-- from "The Player"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9HxhcR2fhD3+UKoQRAjIYAJ4ykGyqI4Tyq0gybPWkKc0v4Z4TqwCgigTr
8UWGBygFSow4+8UznbAnIpU=
=hk+f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
