you either need to use:
denied-smsc-id = id2;id3
for each connection, listing the other connections or just:

allowed-smsc-id = id1
for each connection, listing the same same as the smsc-id

eg:

> group = smsc
> smsc = smpp
> smsc-id = id1
> allowed-smsc-id = id1
> address-range = 12341
>
> group = smsc
> smsc = smpp
> allowed-smsc-id = id2
> smsc-id = id2
> address-range = 12342

Bill.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Tully" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 2:35 PM
Subject: multiple SMSC connections


> Hi
>
> I'm running multiple SMSC conenctions - all to the same SMSC - they're
> insisting that we use a separate bind for each shortcode used..
> Problem is that I send a message to one sendsms-user, which has
forced-smsc
> set, but it routes to any of the 5 SMSC connections.
>
> I'm hoping it's somethign obvious...
>
> I'm running CVS dated 18/6/03
>
> A simplified version of parts of my config is here:
>
> group = smsc
> smsc = smpp
> smsc-id = id1
> address-range = 12341
>
> group = smsc
> smsc = smpp
> smsc-id = id2
> address-range = 12342
>
> group = smsc
> smsc = smpp
> smsc-id = id3
> address-range = 12343
>
> group = smsc
> smsc = smpp
> smsc-id = id4
> address-range = 12344
>
> group = smsc
> smsc = smpp
> smsc-id = id5
> address-range = 12345
>
>
> # SEND-SMS USERS
>
> group = sendsms-user
> username = tester1
> password = foobar
> forced-smsc = id1
> default-sender = 12341
> faked-sender = 12341
>
> group = sendsms-user
> username = tester2
> password = foobar
> forced-smsc = id2
> default-sender = 12342
> faked-sender = 12342
>
> group = sendsms-user
> username = tester3
> password = foobar
> forced-smsc = id3
> default-sender = 12343
> faked-sender = 12343
>
> group = sendsms-user
> username = tester4
> password = foobar
> forced-smsc = id4
> default-sender = 12344
> faked-sender = 12344
>
> group = sendsms-user
> username = tester5
> password = foobar
> forced-smsc = id5
> default-sender = 12345
> faked-sender = 12345
>
>
> Any help/suggestions appreciated!
>
>
> David.
>
>
>
>


Reply via email to