FFII News -- For Immediate Release -- Please Redistribute 
+++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ 

EU Software Patent Directive plans shelved amid massive demonstrations 

Brussels 2003/09/01 

For Immediate Release 

On Aug 28th, the European Parliament postponed its vote on the proposed 
EU Software Patent Directive. The day before, approximately 500 persons 
had gathered for a rally beside the Parliament in Brussels, accompanied 
by an online demonstration involving more than 2000 websites. The events 
in and near the Parliament were extensively in many news channels, 
including tv and radio, across Europe and the world. Within a few days, 
the petition calling the European Parliament to reject software 
patentability accumulated 50,000 new signatures. 

Details 

Last Wednesday, August 27th, several organisations called for a 
demonstration in Brussels and for an on-line demonstration against the 
proposed EU "software patent directive" COM(2002)92, euphemistically 
titled "on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions". 

Citizens demonstrated in front of the European Parliament, wearing black 
t-shirts and launching black balloons "to symbolise their sorrow for the 
innovation that the EU would lose if it approved a monopoly regime on 
computer based solutions as the Commission and the JURI report propose", 
as one of the organisers explained. Surrounded by banners and patent 
tombstones, several speeches were held and a pantomime play was performed 
which showed the EU bureaucracy helping wealthy corporations to strangle 
small innovative software enterprises. 

In spite of the short notice (it was only announced one week in advance), 
the online demonstration, calling to substitute homepages by a protest 
page for all of Wednesday, was followed by over 2800 websites. Among 
those were important websites such as those of the biggest Spanish labour 
union Comisiones Obreras, the Andalusian CGT union, the French SPECIS; 
large associations of computer professionals such as ATI.es, AI2 and 
Prosa.dk; user associations like SSLUG, Hispalinux, Asociaci�n de 
Internautas, AFUL and GUUG; software projects like Apache (developers of 
the most used web server in the world, with over 25 million 
installations), PHP (a very popular programing language), the two main 
free desktop projects (KDE and GNOME); operating system distributions 
LinEx, Slackware, Debian, Knoppix and Mandrake; civil rights 
associations, distributed development platform Savannah (hosting over 
1500 projects), companies, weblogs, personal websites... 

The strike coincided with initiatives by new players, including national 
associations of SMEs, national labor unions, the internet sections of the 
French Parti Socialiste and German Social Democratic Party, and a 
[16]group of economists, all of whom sent letters to members of the 
European Parliament, warning them of faulty reasoning in the JURI report 
and catastrophic consequences for the European economy. 

The Parliament was already [17]divided in June, when it [18]postponed 
the decision to September. The massive protest among computer 
professionals, software companies and computer users, and its echo in 
the press on the Internet, radio and television, appear to have 
further eroded the directive's support in the European Parliament and 
encouraged various party groups to come out with new amendment 
proposals. The presidents of the transnational groups decided in a 
meeting on thursday afternoon to postpone the debate again from the 
planned European Parliament plenary session of Monday September 1st. 
The debate and vote may now take place in the next session (September 
22-25) or at a later date, subject to decision next week. The 
directive has been controversial since its publication on 2002-02-20, 
and decisions have been delayed already seven times from the initially 
scheduled vote of 2002-12-16. 

During a conference in the European Parliament on Wednesday 14.00-16.00, 
Reinier Bakels, a dutch law scholar who had written a study on the 
directive at the order of the European Parliament, criticised: 

This directive proposal brings no clarity and no harmonisation. It is 
unclear and contradictory both on its aims and on the means of 
achieving these aims. The European Parliament can not be expected to 
repair such a fundamentally broken directive proposal. The best thing 
the Parliament can do is to send this proposal back to the Commission 
and demand that an interdisciplinary group of experts should work out a 
new proposal. 

Hartmut Pilch, president of FFII and speaker of the Eurolinux 
Alliance, agreed to this, but added: 

We hope that MEPs can, during the coming 3 weeks, understand that 
almost every single article and every single recital of this directive 
needs major amendments, if a clear limitation of patentability is to be 
achieved. We have proposed a set of amendments[26] which could do the 
job and has received backing by a large part ot the interested 
communities[27]. Many of these amendments have already been or are 
being tabled by MEPs from various political groups. By voting for these 
amendments, MEPs can prompt the Commission and the Council to come up 
with a new proposal, this time based on a serious assessment of the 
interests of all parties and a verifiable solution to the problems, 
without any more doublespeak or ambiguous terminology. 

Annotated Links 

-> [19]Draft Press Release 200000 
Report about the successes of the Demo in BXL, focussing on the 
rise in number of petition signatures. 

-> [20]CORDIS 2003-08-28: Draft legislation on patenting computerised 
inventions will stifle innovation, claim protestors 
An official EU news agency reports about the demo, with an 
interview of Peter Gerwinski from FFII 

see also [21]CORDIS: MEPs vote to tighten up rules on 
patentability of computerised inventions 

Media Contacts 

mail: 
media at ffii org 

phone: 
Hartmut Pilch +49-89-18979927 

More Contacts to be supplied upon request 

About the Eurolinux Alliance -- www.eurolinux.org 

The EuroLinux Alliance for a Free Information Infrastructure is an 
open coalition of commercial companies and non-profit associations 
united to promote and protect a vigourous European Software Culture 
based on copyright, open standards, open competition and open source 
software such as Linux. Corporate members or sponsors of EuroLinux 
develop or sell software under free, semi-free and non-free licenses 
for operating systems such as GNU/Linux, MacOS or MS Windows. 

About the FFII -- www.ffii.org 

The Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII) is a 
non-profit association registered in Munich, which is dedicated to the 
spread of data processing literacy. FFII supports the development of 
public information goods based on copyright, free competition, open 
standards. More than 250 members, 300 companies and 15,000 supporters 
have entrusted the FFII to act as their voice in public policy 
questions in the area of exclusivity rights (intellectual property) in 
the field of software. 

Permanent URL of this Press Release 

http://swpat.ffii.org/news/03/demo0827/index.en.html 

Annotated Links 

-> [22]2003/08/25-9 BXL: Software Patent Directive Amendments 
Members of the European Parliament are coming back to work on 
monday August 25th. It is the last week before the vote on the 
Software Patent Directive Proposal. We are organising a 
conference and street rally wednesday the 27th. Some of our 
friends will moreover be staying in the parliament for several 
days. Time to work decide on submission of amendments to the 
software patent directive proposal is running out. FFII has 
proposed one set of amendments that stick as closely as 
possible to the original proposal while debugging and somewhat 
simplifying it. An alternative small set of amendments would 
"cut the crap" and rewrite the directive from scratch. We 
present and explain the possible approaches. 

-> [23]Online Demonstration Against Software Patents 
We can show our concern by physical presence as well as by more 
or less gently blocking access to webpages in a concerted 
manner at certain times. 

-> [24]Vote in 8 days: 2000 IT bosses urge European Parliament to say 
NO to software patents 
A "Petition for a Free Europe without Software Patents" has 
gained more than 150000 signatures. Among the supporters are 
more than 2000 company owners and chief executives and 25000 
developpers and engineers from all sectors of the European 
information and telecommunication industries, as well as more 
than 2000 scientists and 180 lawyers. Companies like Siemens, 
IBM, Alcatel and Nokia lead the list of those whose researchers 
and developpers want to protect programming freedom and 
copyright property against what they see as a "patent 
landgrab". Currently the patent policy of many of these 
companies is still dominated by their patent departments. These 
have intensively lobbied the European Parliament to support a 
proposal to allow patentability of "computer-implemented 
inventions" (recent patent newspeak term which usually refers 
to software in the context of patent claims, i.e. algorithms 
and business methods framed in terms of generic computing 
equipment), which the rapporteur, UK Labour MEP Arlene 
McCarthy, backed by "patent experts" from the socialist and 
conservative blocks, is trying to rush through the European 
Parliament on June 30, just 13 days after she had won the vote 
in the Legal Affairs Committe (JURI). 

-> [25]FFII: Software Patents in Europe 
For the last few years the European Patent Office (EPO) has, 
contrary to the letter and spirit of the existing law, granted 
more than 30000 patents on computer-implemented rules of 
organisation and calculation (programs for computers). Now 
Europe's patent movement is pressing to consolidate this 
practise by writing a new law. Europe's programmers and 
citizens are facing considerable risks. Here you find the basic 
documentation, starting from a short overview and the latest 
news. 

References 

16. http://swpat.ffii.org/news/03/ekon0820/index.en.html 
17. http://swpat.ffii.org/news/03/plen0620/index.en.html 
18. http://swpat.ffii.org/news/03/plen0626/index.en.html 
19. http://wiki.ael.be/index.php/PressRelease200000 
20. 
http://dbs.cordis.lu/cgi-bin/srchidadb?CALLER=NHP_EN_NEWS&ACTION=D&SESSION=&RCN=EN_RCN_ID:20801&TBL=EN_NEWS
 
21. 
http://dbs.cordis.lu/cgi-bin/srchidadb?CALLER=NHP_EN_NEWS&ACTION=D&SESSION=&RCN=EN_RCN_ID:20436
 
22. http://swpat.ffii.org/events/2003/europarl/08/index.en.html 
23. http://swpat.ffii.org/group/demo/index.en.html 
24. http://swpat.ffii.org/news/03/epet0622/index.en.html 
25. http://swpat.ffii.org/index.en.html 
26. http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/eubsa-swpat0202/prop/index.en.html 
27. http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/eubsa-swpat0202/demands/index.en.html 




Reply via email to