We connect to many different telcos, and there are some variances in how MessageId is provided, and how DLR info is provided, being opensource, you could add and fiddle some code to handle your particalur circumstance, we also wanted some other handling for passing in a transaction no, (although some will say should use dlr-url) and we store the dlr info in a gdbm files, these are extras we build to the open source code, u can't do that if the code is closed. If a stable build exactly works for your situation, your laughing, otherwise u know u could change it if needed.
However it can be particularly stressful, for in a production environment, and there are reasons to keep up with the cvs head development, plus your own changes. And also it is in C! ATM i'm dreaming of reproducing the kannel idea in C++, for one thing piss off this C plugin style for DLR databases, and smsc s, and piss off that octstr stuff, there creat,destroy, etc its just crazy - working in C is a big backward for me. (-) but i won't have the time..... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dziugas Baltrunas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "E Monchanin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 5:30 AM Subject: Re: NowMMS / Kannel -#- MailID:QAAA > Hi, > > as you have already guessed, among the other features the bigest one is > opensource! :) > > WAP Push and SMS xmit/recv is almost transparent in Kannel. What is more, > NowSMS runs on win32 systems, although Kannel is multiplatform. > > Dziugas > > On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, E Monchanin wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I have a question concerning the difference btw Kannel and NowSMS (dispite the fact that one is opensource and not the other) > > > > We don't need the wap gateway feature of that, just the capacity to send SMS and SMS Wap push. > > > > What are the pros / cons > > > > I see the question has already been asked in May, but nobody answered. > > > > thank you > > > > Eric > > >
