Beng, (Sorry James, I was mistaken about the sender before :) ) I'd suggest you to use 1.3.2. It is as stable as 1.2.1 but it's a lot more functional.
In my own experience, 1.3.2 it's far better when it comes to SMSC connection behaviour (it's far more stable an configurable). Furthermore, if you are planning to use DLR's, on 1.2.1 they are completely broken! Regards, On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:22:46 +0800, bw t <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James, > > Thanks for the reply. > > I will use 1.2.1 instead of 1.3.1, because 1.2.1 is the stable version. > > Thanks. > > >From: James Coleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: Beng Wooi Toh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: Kannel tested on Red Hat Linux 9 ? > >Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:05:46 +0100 > > > >On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 02:17:46PM +0800, Beng Wooi Toh wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I am very new to Kannel. I am trying to get one working on my system. > > > > > > Is Kannel tested on Red Hat Linux 9 with kernel 2.4.20-20.9 ? Does > >Kannel > > > support this platform ? > > > >No particular dependancies on linux providers and kernels really. > > > >Definately works with redhat 9 ... this is me: > > > > > >$ cat /etc/redhat-release > >Red Hat Linux release 9 (Shrike) > >$ uname -a > >Linux et.v.e.a.com 2.4.20-8 #1 Thu Mar 13 17:54:28 EST 2003 i686 i686 i386 > >GNU/Linux > > > > > >Use 1.3.1 or greater versions of kannel. > >mysql building had issues with 1.3.1 which are easily solved. > > later releases should fix it completely. > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Are you in love? Find a date on MSN Personals http://match.msn.com.my/ > > -- Alejandro Guerrieri Magicom http://www.magicom-bcn.net/
