Oscar, As far as I know, that's not possible "out of the box".
In such setup, bearerbox will always try to use the first available link, so the second one will only get some hits when the server is under high load or when the first link goes down. I would name that "failover", not "load balancing". It may fit your needs, but don't expect the load to be balanced through your available connections: First one will get most of it, I have a somewhat similar setup (with 2 receiver links and 2 sender links) and out of 1000 messages, just a few of them (less than 10 usually) got into the secondary links (except when the first one goes down, of course). Hope it helps, On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:10:03 -0600, Oscar Medina Duarte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all ! > > Is it possible to load balance the same route between two smsboxes ? > > For instance, to have a routing config like this: > > group = smsbox-route > smsbox-id = "smsbox_01" > shortcuts = "64235" > > group = smsbox-route > smsbox-id = "smsbox_02" > shortcuts = "64235" > > And have the bearer to round robin this route between the two smsboxes, > and in case one of them fails, the other one will handle the received > messages until the other one gets up again. > > Thanks a lot !! > > == Oscar > Tashi Delek > > -- Alejandro Guerrieri Magicom http://www.magicom-bcn.net/
