Hello!

Well yes, that I know, I intentionaly disconnected it. The real problem is that the sendsms script still produces HTTP Status 202, which means that the message was sent, but it is not - and it is also not after I connect the SMSC back.

Thanks for your input!

Kind regards,
Dejan
----- Original Message ----- From: "Aarno Syvänen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dejan Markic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <users@kannel.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: sendsms script problems



What are your allowed smsc and forced sms parameters. Error means
that bearerbox cannot find a smsc to send the message.

Aarno

On 31.3.2005, at 09:54, Dejan Markic wrote:

Hey!

Nobody knows anything about this, or am I missing something here?

Kind regards,
Dejan
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dejan Markic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <users@kannel.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 10:24 AM
Subject: sendsms script problems


Hello!

I'm now using Kannel (1.4.0) for quite some time, still in testing though, as the SMS gateway and I have stumbled upon a problem.
When I disable the SMSC Connection the smssend script still returns HTTP status 202 altough I see in the bearerbox log file that the message was rejected because there is no 'router'.
Actual message from log file:
2005-03-29 10:13:23 [17243] [13] WARNING: Cannot find SMSCConn for message to <xxxxxxxxxx>, rejected.
2005-03-29 10:13:23 [17243] [13] WARNING: Message rejected by bearerbox, no router!
I was trying to implement somekind of failover, if kannel would report it cannot send the message, I would send it through other methods, but I receive OK status altough kannel will not send it.
Can I do something about this?!


Thanks for your input!

Kind regards,
Dejan







Reply via email to