Re: Kannel eat memory too big

[Ady Wicaksono]

1. Yes, i'm being throttled, receiver is not throttled but transmitter is throttled. However i run this application as transciever. 2.  Apache misconfigured -> what kind of misconfigured application ? I made application asynchronous, it means that kannel will forward sms to http application (which some of them made by PHP, perl, or JSP) however this application will print nothing, i've been set "omit-empty=true". Another process incoming SMS and send the reply to the sender. Thx Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: What it's obvious is that you're receiving messages faster than delivering. That means that sooner or later you get a whole bunch of queued messages. A few things I'd check: * Could be that you are being throttled? I don't think so (0.87 msgs/second doesn't look like a suitable throughput for throttling). Check on the smsbox.log anyway, and if that's the case adjust throttling to avoid this problem. * How are your apps doing? I'd take a look at the applications, maybe they are responding too slowly and that's what it's causing the delays. * A misconfigured Apache could be the cause also. * Check calling the apps from a web browser, how long does it take to respond? * Is there anything noteworthy on the logs? What does they say about the queued messages? Hope it helps, Alejandro. On 8/8/05, Ady Wicaksono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Chriss, sorry for late response, i'm restarting and waiting this kannel eating my memory :) I did, look at this complete log Kannel bearerbox version `1.4.0'. Build `Jul 20 2005 19:06:58', compiler `3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5)'. System Linux, release 2.4.20-8smp, version #1 SMP Thu Mar 13 17:45:54 EST 2003, machine i686. Hostname ******, IP 127.0.0.1 <http://127.0.0.1/>. Libxml version 2.5.4. Compiled with MySQL 4.1.9, using MySQL 4.1.9. Using native malloc. Status: running, uptime 3d 19h 39m 43s WDP: received 0 (0 queued), sent 0 (0 queued) SMS: received 515767 (0 queued), sent 258900 (0 queued), store size 455 SMS: inbound 1.56 msg/sec, outbound 0.78 msg/sec DLR: 2388 queued, using mysql storage Box connections: smsbox:(none), IP 127.0.0.1 <http://127.0.0.1/> (0 queued), (on-line 3d 19h 39m 41s) SMSC connections: ********* SMPP:******************* (online 329983s, rcvd 515767, sent 258900, failed 0, queued 454 msgs) Still have no IDEA :( huh Chris Dobbs wrote: Have you configured Kannel to use a database for DLR storage? if not it stored them in memory hashes until they are completed. I found Kannle used MUCH less memory once I had DLR's into the DB. -Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: Ady Wicaksono To: users@kannel.org Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 12:22 PM Subject: Kannel eat memory too big Log at the "top" result below, bbox-smsc1 eat about 197Mbyte and smsc2 eat 120M and growing i use kannel 1.4.0. Is it normal or, kannel has a memory leak ? Any information & suggestion is normal Thx ----------- cut here --------- 18:13:43 up 147 days, 15 min, 1 user, load average: 0.02, 0.03, 0.00 539 processes: 538 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped CPU0 states: 2.3% user 2.0% system 0.0% nice 0.0% iowait 95.0% idle CPU1 states: 3.3% user 1.0% system 0.0% nice 0.0% iowait 95.0% idle Mem: 2064252k av, 2038984k used, 25268k free, 0k shrd, 294952k buff 1217516k actv, 0k in_d, 45028k in_c Swap: 4192924k av, 2508k used, 4190416k free 926492k cached PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME CPU COMMAND 11205 smsc2 15 0 197M 197M 1436 S 0.7 9.7 28:58 0 bbox-smsc1 16239 smsc1 15 0 120M 119M 1424 S 0.0 5.9 18:32 0 bbox-smsc2 ----------- cut here --------- -- Regards, Ady Wicaksono HP: +628562208680 -- Regards, Ady Wicaksono HP: +628562208680