Hi Anselmo,
 
Yes I did get your email, sorry I meant to reply with some more in depth information but got sidetracked on other things.
 
The problem I see is:
 
1. Insert message into sqlbox send_sms table
2. sqlbox picks it up, passes it to bearerbox
3. bearerbox passes it via smpp to carrier
 
All fine so far, but then the problems come..
 
4. dlr comes in to bearerbox via smpp
5. some dlrs get passed to sqlbox, but after a time (around 50-100 dlrs) it all jams up. kannel's store includes the 50-100 dlrs plus any further messages - also there are lots of 'ACK/' messages in the kannel store. The dlr never reaches the URL specified.
 
I'll message you off-list to see what further information I can provide.
 
Thanks,
Alex
 
 

 
On 5/12/06, Mi Reflejo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm reopening that issue. I dont know if you got the mail that i send
you on 5/7.

Hi Alex, i was doing a couple of tests.
At First, every time that the smsbox got a delivery report the logs
said "INFO: Starting to service <ACK/>". (it means that smsbox is
trying to route the dlr as an MO). And sent_sms table had something
like : "| 147    | MO   | 1010       | 1157494777 |         | ACK/ |
(....)"

i did a checkout and then everything was fine.

Please try a checkout, if it doesn't work please send me more debug
logs and what are you doing exactly (The INSERT statment, for example)
and i'll try to reproduce your error.

Regards,
Anselmo



On 5/7/06, Mi Reflejo <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> Hi Alex, i was doing a couple of tests.
> At First, every time that the smsbox got a delivery report the logs
> said "INFO: Starting to service <ACK/>". (it means that smsbox is
> trying to route the dlr as an MO). And sent_sms table had something
> like : "| 147    | MO   | 1010       | 1157494777 |         | ACK/ |
> (....)"
>
> i did a checkout and then everything was fine.
>
> Please try a checkout, if it doesn't work please send me more debug
> logs and what are you doing exactly (The INSERT statment, for example)
> and i'll try to reproduce your error.
>
> Regards,
> Anselmo
>


Reply via email to