No, if you deleted kannel's logs there's no other place to look for info. It's a good idea to keep your kannel logs a little longer, since billing problems typically manifests a month or two after the real charge took place.
You could try sending a few more messages and compare your findings (and will cost you a few more bucks of course). Regards, Alejandro On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Peter Lum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > Unfortunately, I deleted the logs every month and it happened in April and > I got billed in May... :-( > Are there any other places for logs? > > Thanks! > Peter > > ------------------------------ > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue Jun 03 21:33:53 2008 > Received: from kannel.fink.org [193.53.0.98] by mail225.cybersite.com.sgwith > SMTP; > Tue, 3 Jun 2008 21:33:53 +0800 > Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39606 helo=k1.kannel.org) > by k1.kannel.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) > (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) > id 1K3Wc4-0004Bv-59; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:31:44 +0200 > Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.237]:32920) > by k1.kannel.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) > (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1K3Wc0-0004Bp-11 > for users@kannel.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:31:41 +0200 > Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c57so480975wra.4 > for <users@kannel.org>; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 06:31:38 -0700 (PDT) > Received: by 10.100.178.7 with SMTP id a7mr3782938anf.68.1212499898228; > Tue, 03 Jun 2008 06:31:38 -0700 (PDT) > Received: by 10.100.3.18 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 06:31:38 -0700 (PDT) > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 10:31:38 -0300 > From: "Alejandro Guerrieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "users@kannel.org" <users@kannel.org> > Subject: Re: 7-bit or 8-bit? > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="----=_Part_1586_7127678.1212499898199" > References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > X-Spam_score: -2.5 > X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system " > ghost.tolj.org", > has > identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message > has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or > label similar future email. If you have any questions, see > the administrator of that system for details. > Content preview: Peter, First of all, check your logs, you should be > able to count the number of messages there. After that, you should talk > with your operator to clarify mathematics ;) [...] > Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 3.0 required) > pts rule name description > ---- ---------------------- > -------------------------------------------------- > 0.0 TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL To: repeats address as real name > 0.1 RCVD_BY_IP Received by mail server with no name > -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% > [score: 0.0000] > 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message > 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list > X-BeenThere: users@kannel.org > X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 > Precedence: list > List-Id: Users mailing list <users.kannel.org> > List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.kannel.org/mailman/listinfo/users>, > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > List-Archive: <http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/users> > List-Post: <mailto:users@kannel.org> > List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > List-Subscribe: <http://www.kannel.org/mailman/listinfo/users>, > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-SmarterMail-Spam: SPF_None > X-Rcpt-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Peter, > > First of all, check your logs, you should be able to count the number of > messages there. > > After that, you should talk with your operator to clarify mathematics ;) > > Regards, > > Alejandro > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Peter Lum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I've got a kannel box connected to a siemens GSM modem and I thought it >> was working fine until I did a broadcast message to about 1000 recipients. >> The message I sent is only 152 characters. >> >> For the 1000 recipients with 152 characters, I got billed for 3000 SMS >> from my telco!!! >> I assumed that I will be sending only 1000 SMS!! >> >> In addition, there is a problem when receiving the message on the actual >> handset. I received first part of the message on one day, and the completed >> message on the next day... >> >> When I called up my telco for explanation, they says I sent the messages >> in ascii-8-bit format, which has a character limit of 140 characters. >> So, if I sent 152 characters, 2 SMS will be delivered. The normal format, >> according to Telco, is 7-bit. But why I was billed 3 times?? >> >> So, I was wondering where and if I can set Kannel to deliver messages in >> 7-bit? >> >> HELP!!!! >> >> Peter >> > > >
