if i dont use the midlet, the whoel thing is working perfectly fine!!!......

i know, there is some problem with the midlet!..


2009/12/16 Nikos Balkanas <nbalka...@gmail.com>

>  Hi,
>
> I don't know what you are doing with your middlet. That's your business.
> But 06 in udh header means wap push protocol, and wbxml body is from wap
> push specs. This is still a wap push to a different port, and it is send
> over SMS.
>
> BR,
> Nikos
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>  *From:* Henri Hovi <henri.h...@patidure.com>
> *To:* Nikos Balkanas <n...@amdtelecom.net>
> *Cc:* users@kannel.org
>  *Sent:* Wednesday, December 16, 2009 11:15 AM
> *Subject:* Re: wap push to midlet
>
> Well, when I send the SMS to start the application by using middlet push
> registry service, i just send an empty SMS to the port on the device which
> is configured for the middlet in JAD. So I don't consired it as a wap push.
>
> --
> H
>
> 2009/12/16 Nikos Balkanas <n...@amdtelecom.net>
>
>>  Hi,
>>
>> Sorry, but the SMS is exactly like wap push. In fact, wap push is sent
>> over as SMS. But you have to watch to have the correct udh and wbxml
>> encoding. If not, it won't show up. Of course the major issue is your
>> middlet. This is something you have done, and we cannot debug it for you. To
>> see if your wap push works, test it as a normal push first (don't change
>> ports). Your mobile has to have pushes enabled.
>>
>> BR,
>> Nikos
>>
>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>  *From:* Henri Hovi <henri.h...@patidure.com>
>> *To:* Rajeev Agarwal <rajeev.agarw...@gmail.com>
>>   *Cc:* Nikos Balkanas <n...@amdtelecom.net> ; users@kannel.org
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 16, 2009 8:52 AM
>> *Subject:* Re: wap push to midlet
>>
>> The SMS is just signaling that the application should start, so it's not
>> like traditional WAP Push.
>>
>> Some devices just starts automatically, I have seen only Nokia requesting
>> user to confirm the start. So in other cases, there would be no case to even
>> display the message.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Henri
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 5:06 AM, Rajeev Agarwal <
>> rajeev.agarw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The thing that i am doing right now is changing the destination port in
>>> the UDH to 40AB (16555 in decimal). 40AB is also the midlet port. When the
>>> phone receives the msg, the midlet gets activated. But i does not display
>>> the actual text that i have in the form of an encoded URL, as shown below
>>>
>>>
>>> http://xxx.xxx.x.xxx:15015/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=tester&password=foobar&to=xxxxxxxxxx&udh=
>>> %06%05%04%40%AB%23%F0
>>> &text=%FF%06%01%AE%02%05%6A%00%45%C6%0C%03%77%77%77%2e%67%6f%6f%67%6c%65%2e%63%6f%2e%69%6e%2f%6d%6f%62%69%6c%65%00%01%03%57%65%6c%63%6f%6d%65%20%74%6f%20%47%6f%6f%67%6c%65%00%01%01%
>>>
>>>
>>> Any thoughts on this??..
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> 2009/12/15 Nikos Balkanas <n...@amdtelecom.net>
>>>
>>>  Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Wap push is at a predefined port. You cannot change it through UDH
>>>> headers in wapbox. Wapbox doesn't support UDH. But you can do it through
>>>> smsbox (as suggested by Henri).
>>>>
>>>> BR,
>>>> Nikos
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>  *From:* Henri Hovi <henri.h...@patidure.com>
>>>> *To:* Rajeev Agarwal <rajeev.agarw...@gmail.com>
>>>> *Cc:* users@kannel.org
>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:36 PM
>>>> *Subject:* Re: wap push to midlet
>>>>
>>>> No need to use wap push, just SMS with UDH
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Henri
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Rajeev Agarwal <
>>>> rajeev.agarw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> hi!!
>>>>>
>>>>> I've changed the udh destination port according to my midlet port. But
>>>>> wen i use the encoded url for wap push it does not get displayed.
>>>>> i get some error!..has anyone tried this before?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> pls help!
>>>>>
>>>>> regards
>>>>>
>>>>> rajeev.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Henri Hovi
>>>> http://www.patidure.com
>>>> http://patidure.blogspot.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Henri Hovi
>> http://www.patidure.com
>> http://patidure.blogspot.com
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Henri Hovi
> http://www.patidure.com
> http://patidure.blogspot.com
>
>

Reply via email to