Yeah I understand that. But when the there is no traffic. Kannel doesn't release the cached or buffered memory it used. Do you have any solution? What command to list down or trace the memory usage by Kannel? So maybe we can investigate which function or module in Kannel is eating the memory. Thanks
sangprabv sangpr...@gmail.com http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/ On Aug 9, 2010, at 11:19 PM, Nikos Balkanas wrote: > No memory problems. It is reasonable that kannel will use more memory in > higher traffic, since all queues are in memory, as long as it drops to > nominal levels once the traffic is gone. > > BR, > Nikos > ----- Original Message ----- From: sangprabv > To: brett skinner > Cc: Nikos Balkanas ; kannel users > Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 5:59 PM > Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking > > > Hi Nikos, > Do you experience memory problem? In my case Kannel is eating the memory on > high load traffics. I always need to restart the box to get more memory. I > even give 3 on /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches but still Kannel eat the memory :( > > > > > > > sangprabv > sangpr...@gmail.com > http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/ > > > > > On Aug 9, 2010, at 9:42 PM, brett skinner wrote: > > > Hi Nikos > > Out of curiosity can you go into more detail regarding what hardware you were > running and your setup for MySql? Were you using Innodb or MyIsam. If you > were using Innodb did you make any other configuration changes to MySql to > accommodate Innodb. > > From the user guide it is implied that the bottle neck for Kannel is the > number of messages that the SMSC can accommodate per second. Is this still > the case? > > Regards, > > > 2010/8/8 Nikos Balkanas <nbalka...@gmail.com> > > Hi, > > I have run some benchmarking for a client using fakesmpp. Using the default > service for MO's I got: > > MO's: 1400 SMS/s > MT + DLRs (internal): 747 SMS/s > MT + DLRs (MySql): 434 SMS/s > > BR, > Nikos > ----- Original Message ----- From: ha...@aeon.pk > To: kannel users > Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 4:22 PM > Subject: Kannel performance benchmarking > > > > Hi, > > > I am interested to know about the kannel performance benchmarking, especially > in terms of speed (msgs/sec), MO or MT. I assume that multiple smsboxes does > not have any effect over kannel performance, since the front-end talking to > SMSC is the main bearerbox. What is the max speed that could be attained by > kannel and/or bearerbox? > > > Regards, > > > Hamza
