Ok, just saw on another thread where you got those values from, but again, that's very system specific.
I guess you point was just to say that Kannel was not the issue for his bottleneck, but saying "It can handle ~1000 MO/s, 750 MT/s (internal DLRs) or 450 MT/s (DB DLRs)" may give the wrong impression that that's the maximum it can handle, or that it can always handle that load, while on low end servers it may not. So saying something like that in that way can confuse new users, IMHO. On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Juan Nin <jua...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/8/13 Nikos Balkanas <nbalka...@gmail.com>: >> >> It is unlikely that kannel is your bottleneck. It can handle ~1000 MO/s, 750 >> MT/s (internal DLRs) or 450 MT/s (DB DLRs). > > > Just curious to know where do you get those values from... > What Kannel supports depends on your hardware and architecture > -- Juan Nin 3Cinteractive / Mobilizing Great Brands http://www.3cinteractive.com
