1. I replied to your message that didn’t have users in CC. That’s why it didn’t get here.
2. What we are trying to make clear to you is that message queuing isn’t a Kannel issue. SMS messages are not guaranteed to arrive within a specific time or order.… and not even guaranteed to arrive at all. == Rene From: adil nazir [mailto:adil_nazi...@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, 17 August, 2010 19:04 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: Problem of messages with same priority Please add users@kannel.org in Cc thanks That is why i am saying that if kennel can handle priority messages then why it cant handle message sequence? _____ From: Rene Kluwen <rene.klu...@chimit.nl> To: adil nazir <adil_nazi...@yahoo.com> Cc: Alejandro Guerrieri <alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com> Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 9:12:10 PM Subject: RE: Problem of messages with same priority SMS messages carrying a higher priority are sent to the smsc first. After that, they are on their own. == Rene From: adil nazir [mailto:adil_nazi...@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, 17 August, 2010 18:10 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: adil nazir; Alejandro Guerrieri Subject: Re: Problem of messages with same priority yes i know but if kannel can send SMS having high priority before the low priority then it means it has the ability to send SMS in specific order. If SMS –by nature- uses a store-and-forward scheme then how priority works with kannel and why they implement priority queue in kannel drivers. _____ From: Rene Kluwen <rene.klu...@chimit.nl> To: adil nazir <adil_nazi...@yahoo.com>; Alejandro Guerrieri <alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com> Cc: users@kannel.org Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 9:02:59 PM Subject: RE: Problem of messages with same priority SMS –by nature- uses a store-and-forward scheme. Even if Kannel sends messages out in a specific order, it doesn’t mean that messages arrive in the same order. If it is important that messages arrive in a specific order, then implement a system that waits for a final dlr state and after that send the next message. == Rene From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of adil nazir Sent: Tuesday, 17 August, 2010 17:39 To: Alejandro Guerrieri Cc: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: Problem of messages with same priority But this is not good because if we already have thousands of messages in our queue then how can is it possible to deliver new incoming message before queued messages. I think it is duty of Kannel to take care of message sequence in the same way as it take care of messages with different priority. Can anyone suggest the solution to solve this problem? I want that Kannel work like FIFO queue. Also tell me if we use sms.time field of message then can we solve this problem? because arrival time of messages having same priority will different. so we can differentiate them with there time. _____ From: Alejandro Guerrieri <alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com> To: Alvaro Cornejo <cornejo.alv...@gmail.com> Cc: adil nazir <adil_nazi...@yahoo.com>; users@kannel.org Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 7:26:12 PM Subject: Re: Problem of messages with same priority Yes, and despite Kannel honors order of arrival at first, if messages are queued and retried is hard to tell what the final order would be, specially if a bind or the whole service is restarted. Regards, Alex On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Alvaro Cornejo <cornejo.alv...@gmail.com> wrote: Note that is your sms provider/operator smsc who finally takes care of messages. If Kannel send messages in 1,2,3 order to the smsc it doesn't mean they will arrive in that order to your phone. |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular y Nextel en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y www.pravcom.com On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:11 AM, adil nazir <adil_nazi...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I have tested kannel with messages having same priorities these messages > should be treated like FIFO method means which message comes first should be > reached first on particular smsc but kannel is treated all messages, having > same priorities, equal and deliver them randomly even there arrival time is > different why? Can anyone help me in this regard? Any solutions please? > >
