Why, if you can use the dlr-url field for this? Dlr-url has the same value for MT and for DLR.
== Rene From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of T.K.Thapa Sent: Saturday, 11 September, 2010 07:12 To: KangMas Willy Cc: Kannel list Subject: Re: SQL Box Question Can you share newly developed smsbox/sqlbox binary with source code? I will try to compile for my o.s. from your provided source code. Regards Tapan Thapa --- On Sat, 11/9/10, KangMas Willy <sangpr...@gmail.com> wrote: From: KangMas Willy <sangpr...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: SQL Box Question To: "T.K.Thapa" <tapan_thapa2...@yahoo.com> Cc: "Kannel list" <users@kannel.org> Date: Saturday, 11 September, 2010, 6:56 AM For my case I did some patches on smsbox, mysql dlr and sqlbox to store internal message-id and use it to map between MO, MT, and DLR if no foreign-id. And I developed a simple consolidator script and store the result it consolidated table sangprabv sangpr...@gmail.com http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/ On Sep 10, 2010, at 12:34 AM, T.K.Thapa wrote: Hello, I was just checking sqlbox with bearerbox and smsbox to log all sent messages. I have seen that in sent_sms table there is no relation (Like message id mapping) between MT and DLR. Is it normal behaviour? If yes then can you please suggest how will i map sent messages to DLR? Regards Tapan Thapa
