Hi,
Am I missing something here? bb is sending the NACK. Wouldn't bb logs be
more informative?
BR,
Nikos
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rene Kluwen" <rene.klu...@chimit.nl>
To: "'mwamba chishimba'" <bamwa...@gmail.com>
Cc: "'users'" <users@kannel.org>; "'Anthony Musaluke'" <goof2...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 10:35 PM
Subject: RE: Running Short Codes on Kannel (fwd)
Check: log-file in group = smsbox in your kannel.conf.
== Rene
-----Original Message-----
From: mwamba chishimba [mailto:bamwa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 September, 2010 21:08
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc: Anthony Musaluke; users
Subject: Re: Running Short Codes on Kannel (fwd)
Thanx Rene once again,
I have checked the log files unfortunately i don't seem to have smsbox
log file. I have bearerbox.log, access.log and wapbox.log in my
/var/log/kannel/ directory.
Kind Regards
On 9/21/10, Rene Kluwen <rene.klu...@chimit.nl> wrote:
Smsbox will tell you if there was a nack or not.
Possible cause: Invalid smsc-id, but probably there's more reasons.
== Rene
-----Original Message-----
From: mwamba chishimba [mailto:bamwa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 September, 2010 20:18
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc: Anthony Musaluke; users
Subject: Re: Running Short Codes on Kannel (fwd)
Thank you Rene for your response. How can I check whats causing
bearerbox to send a nack? Twisting the question around, what could be
the cause of a nack response?
On 9/21/10, Rene Kluwen <rene.klu...@chimit.nl> wrote:
Sqlbox saves the message upon relaying it to bearerbox.
If bearerbox sends a nack upon return, then sqlbox doesn't delete the
message.
== Rene
-----Original Message-----
From: mwamba chishimba [mailto:bamwa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 September, 2010 19:18
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc: Anthony Musaluke; users
Subject: Re: Running Short Codes on Kannel (fwd)
Hi Everyone,
@Rene: am still trying out "allowed-receiver-prefix" if it doesn't
work then I'll send the file as suggested by Anthony.
Got another puzzle though. We have an http interface that is
integrated with kannel which we use for bulk messaging. It's been
working just fine but on Friday it started behaving funny. When you
send a message using the online interface, it shows that the message
has been queued for delivery. If you go to sqlbox database you will
actually see the sent message in the send_sms table. Unfortunately the
message doesn't get delivered and there is no record of it in the
access log file.
The other services configured on kannel are working just fine only
this online interface is the one with this issue.
I know kannel is ok becasue the other services are running and I also
know that the interface is fine based on the fact that am able to
insert the message into the send_sms table of the sqlbox database. I
like getting dirty with code so any pointers as to where I can begin
my troubleshooting is very much welcome.
Kind Regards,
On 9/17/10, Rene Kluwen <rene.klu...@chimit.nl> wrote:
Sorry.. Maybe you should look at allowed-receiver-prefix. My bad!
== Rene
From: Anthony Musaluke [mailto:goof2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 17 September, 2010 16:26
To: mwamba chishimba
Cc: Rene Kluwen
Subject: Re: Running Short Codes on Kannel (fwd)
Mwamba
its best if you send whole file. How many 'services' have you got? How
many
'keywords'? Kannel does not stop to search when it encounters the first
denied rule, it keeps searching down until it hits a match. This is
what
you
may be experiencing.
Also prefix is normally for the source phone that is allowed to use the
service. For example if you wanted to only allow MTN or Zain you can
use
'allowed-prefix' and set it to 096 or 097.
Thanks
Musaluke
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:28 PM, mwamba chishimba <bamwa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello Rene,
I have tried out what yu suggested and added something else I read but
to no avail. See below:
Sms-service
#Mt Zion
group = sms-service
keyword = prayer
get-url = "http://...............";
omit-empty = true
allowed-prefix = 4321
allowed-smsc-id =C43211
#accepted-smsc = "C44991;C44992;C34661;C34662"
below is the smsc group
group = smsc
smsc = smpp
smsc-id = C43211
host = 1.1.1.1
port = 1111
receive-port = 1111
smsc-username = ""
smsc-password = ""
system-type = "VMA"
my-number = 4321
What am I missing out on?
Kind Regards,
Mwamba
On 9/15/10, mwamba chishimba <bamwa...@gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you Rene, I will give you feedback let me just make the changes.
Kind Regards,
On 9/15/10, Rene Kluwen <rene.klu...@chimit.nl> wrote:
Hello,
Please copy the Kannel users list on consecutive messages. You might
get
more and better response.
But if you do, mask sensitive data such as passwords.
If you want an sms-service to respond to just a particular shortcode,
use
allowed-prefix in group = sms-service.
See:
http://www.kannel.org/download/kannel-userguide-snapshot/userguide.html#AEN3
578
== Rene
-----Original Message-----
From: mwamba chishimba [mailto:bamwa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 15 September, 2010 19:04
To: Rene Kluwen
Subject: Re: Running Short Codes on Kannel
Thank you Rene for your response. I opted to attaching a file I hope
you
don't mind.
Kind Regards
On 9/15/10, Rene Kluwen <rene.klu...@chimit.nl> wrote:
Could you post your config?
-----Original Message-----
From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On
Behalf Of mwamba chishimba
Sent: Wednesday, 15 September, 2010 18:34
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: Running Short Codes on Kannel
Hello everyone!!
Am relatively new to kannel but it's been an interesting ride so
far.
I have a question though and hope someone out there will help me
out.
I have 4 short codes that am running now the problem is that when I
send a request using one of the short codes, the response sometimes
is
returned on a different short code from the four that am
administering.
Has anyone else experienced this using kannel as the sms gateway?
Any
highlights on how I can overcome this will be much appreciated.
Kind Regards,
--
Mwamba Chishimba
"For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor
principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come,
nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to
separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord"
--
Mwamba Chishimba
"For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor
principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come,
nor
height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate
us
from
the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord"
--
Mwamba Chishimba
"For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor
principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come,
nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to
separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord"
--
Mwamba Chishimba
"For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor
principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come,
nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to
separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord"
--
Mwamba Chishimba
"For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor
principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come,
nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to
separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord"
--
Mwamba Chishimba
"For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor
principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come,
nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to
separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord"
--
Mwamba Chishimba
"For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor
principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come,
nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to
separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord"
