Please find the status page content at a particular point of time...I have
more than 5 SMSC connections and I've pasted only one here...
SMS: received 2504832 (397780 queued), sent 1238151 (0 queued), store size
1078
SMS: inbound (6.20,8.86,32.50) msg/sec, outbound (10.1 ,3.56,16.07) msg/sec
.
.
.
*SMPP1* SMPP:xxx.xxx.xxx:xxx/xx:xxxx: (online 63160s, rcvd 338367,
sent 158036, failed 4940, queued 278999 msgs)
--------
*Jinson*
*
*
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri <
alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You have "store size" of 800 thousand? Please paste the status page
> content.
>
> You're wrong about sqlbox, that's not the way it works, and wouldn't make
> any difference in your case.
>
> Regards,
>
> Alex
>
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Jinson <jin...@mobme.in> wrote:
>
>> Please find the responses...
>>
>> Kannel is running as root.
>>
>> There are messages in the queue. but very less when compared to memory
>> queue
>>
>> Queue is about *800 thousand* messages in the worst case. and store will
>> be less than 20 thousand.
>>
>>
>>
>> How can I reduce the amount of queued messages? By giving a cap for the
>> HTTP request to the smsbox?
>>
>> I suppose that by using sqlbox, queue will not be there in memory and
>> messages will be processed from the database.
>>
>> --------
>> *Jinson*
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri <
>> alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, some questions:
>>>
>>> kannel is running as "user"?
>>>
>>> Are you sure there's nothing on the store?
>>>
>>> How big is your queue anyway?
>>>
>>> And some answers:
>>>
>>> Add more memory, or reduce the amount of queued messages. There's no way
>>> out, pending messages will _always_ be kept in memory for performance
>>> reasons (it would be painfully slow otherwise).
>>>
>>> Swapping will trash your performance badly, if you'r sending big amounts
>>> of messages, you need to use the proper hardware to do it.
>>>
>>> sqlbox doesn't have anything to do with your problem.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Jinson <jin...@mobme.in> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I can not afford consuming huge memories...its already using 80% of my
>>>> swap area and message queues are getting increased.
>>>>
>>>> Is there any alternative to solve this? How about sqlbox?
>>>>
>>>> --------
>>>> *Jinson*
>>>> *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri <
>>>> alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Oh, and BTW, the store is a "safeguard" that it's only used when
>>>>> starting the service (to reload pending messages, etc).
>>>>>
>>>>> Under normal operations, kannel will keep all messages in memory _and_
>>>>> back them up on the store. If you shutdown the service (or if it crashes
>>>>> or
>>>>> it's killed), kannel will use the store to restore the queue.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, if you have a huge queue, expect it to consume vast amounts of
>>>>> memory, even with the store in place.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hope it helps,
>>>>>
>>>>> Alex
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri <
>>>>> alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jinson,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> store-dump-freq only applies to the "file" store-type.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you sure that the spool folder exists, and it's writable by the
>>>>>> process kannel is running as?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have you checked the logs?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Jinson <jin...@mobme.in> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry for the trouble. Was trying to convey the exact problem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm still facing this issue. My messages are getting queued up in the
>>>>>>> memory queue and not getting moved into the store.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --------
>>>>>>> *Jinson*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2010/10/26 Nikos Balkanas <nbalka...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not when you are spamming the list. 3 emails about the same thing in
>>>>>>>> the last 4 hours is abuse, for users who volunteer their free time to
>>>>>>>> help.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nikos
>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: Jinson
>>>>>>>> To: users
>>>>>>>> Cc: Divya Philip
>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 3:19 PM
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Question about Store Type
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can somebody help me with the query?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Jinson <jin...@mobme.in> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A correction :
>>>>>>>> I have huge message queue in memory related to each SMSC connection
>>>>>>>> and very less number of messages in store.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Jinson <jin...@mobme.in> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello Group,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can somebody explain how Kannel Store mechanism works?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I can see three configuration parameters in the user guide.
>>>>>>>> store-type, store-location and store-dump-freq.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My problem is that I have huge message queue in memory related to
>>>>>>>> each SMSC connection and very less number of messages in queue. My swap
>>>>>>>> usage is always above 70% because of the memory queues.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is there any way to move these queued messages in memory to store?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Attached my core group conf
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> #Kannel configuration
>>>>>>>> group = core
>>>>>>>> admin-port = xxxx
>>>>>>>> admin-password = "xxx"
>>>>>>>> status-password = "xxxx"
>>>>>>>> smsbox-port = xxxx
>>>>>>>> smsbox-port-ssl = no
>>>>>>>> sms-resend-retry = 0
>>>>>>>> store-type = spool
>>>>>>>> store-location = "/xxxxxxxxxxl"
>>>>>>>> dlr-storage = mysql
>>>>>>>> log-file = "/var/log/kannel/kannel-core.log"
>>>>>>>> access-log = "/var/log/kannel/bearerbox-access.log"
>>>>>>>> log-level = 1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>> Jinson.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
