I do have an existing patch for that, somewhere along the mailinglist.
== Rene From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Alejandro Guerrieri Sent: Tuesday, 18 January, 2011 11:11 To: brett skinner Cc: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: Why does Kannel not use sar_total_segments and sar_segment_seqnum when sending concatenated sms? It means that Kannel doesn't have the ability to re-assemble messages using the sar method. I'm not sure about how extensively used is this method among the carriers, I so far only encountered one case. Regards, Alex On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:08 AM, brett skinner <tatty.dishcl...@gmail.com> wrote: Do you mean as far as Kannel is concerned or that most SMSC don't use this method? So I did understand the spec correctly. It is just that everyone chooses to use the UDH method rather? On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Alejandro Guerrieri <alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com> wrote: It's not implemented afaik. Only the UDH method is supported. Regards, Alex On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:47 AM, brett skinner <tatty.dishcl...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi guys. Does anyone have an ideas to my question below? Thanks, On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:35 AM, brett skinner <tatty.dishcl...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi I was looking through the logs and saw that Kannel sends concatenated SMSs using UDH in the Short Message fields. From reading the SMPP spec I was under the impression that the same thing could be achieved by using sar_total_segments and sar_segment_seqnum. Did I misinterpret the spec or does Kannel not use these fields for another reason such as unreliable implementation on the receiving SMSC. Regards,
