Thanks a lot. Trying to check the sources for any idea

Find that when I use coding=2 any mclass generate me data_coding=0x1X, and
if coding=0 or 1, then mclass generate data_coding=0xFX. Playing with
alt-dcs do nothing to me.
Is there any thoughts why does mclass work for me so?

2012/8/3 Michael Bochkaryov <mi...@rattler.kiev.ua>

>  I think only kannel authors may tell is this feature or bug :-)
> If you need quick solution you can modify code preparing DCS.
>
> This comment from gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c may be an answer.
>
>     /*
>      * set the data coding scheme (DCS) field
>      * check if we have a forced value for this from the smsc-group.
>      * Note: *if message class is set, then we _must_ force alt_dcs*otherwise
>      * dcs has reserved values (e.g. mclass=2, dcs=0x11). We check MWI flag
>      * first here, because MWI and MCLASS can not be set at the same time
> and
>      * function fields_to_dcs check MWI first, so we have no need to force
> alt_dcs
>      * if MWI is set.
>      */
>
>
>
>
> 8/2/2012 4:03 PM, Artem Chekulaev wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot
>
>  I played around "alt-dcs" parameter but there is no effect. As I find in
> Kannel User Guide - this parameter is not used in SMPP connections. So I
> can't set mclass = 0, because receive data_coding = 0xF0 with it, not the
> 0x10
>
>  I can't understand - is it a feature or a bug? Still looking for
> solution.
>
> 2012/8/1 Michael Bochkaryov <mi...@rattler.kiev.ua>
>
>>  8/1/2012 2:55 PM, Artem Chekulaev wrote:
>>
>> Is it possible to change data_coding to 0x14 and protocol_id to 0x40 for
>> single sms? Can I set them manually? I need sometimes to send invisible
>> paid sms - user does not see them, but the money is paid (it legal for me
>> as authorized by provider).
>>
>>
>>  Seems like you need the following sendsms parameters:
>> - mclass and coding to set data_coding (data_coding = 0x14 (00010100):
>> mclass=0 & coding = 1)
>> - pid to set protocol_id (protocol_id = 0x40: pid=64)
>>
>> So mclass=0&coding=1&pid=64
>>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Michael Bochkaryovwww.rattler.kiev.ua
>
>

Reply via email to