Hello, On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Joan <aseq...@gmail.com> wrote: > It took quite a lot of time to find out that the version 1.4.3 doesn't > support a quite typical format for the DLR timestamps, so I'll document it > here for the other people that might be affected. > kannel 1.4.3 supports without issues the format defined in the SMPP > specification 3.4 for DLR timestamps (YYMMDDhhmm) (Appendix B), but it's > common now to find providers using a format with seconds (YYMMDDhhmmss). > Kannel 1.4.3 won't be able to read that timestamp and will mark all the > replies as if there was a malformed response. > > There is a patch in kannel source tree to change this, but probably involves > more changes to work (simply applying the patch doesn't work) > https://redmine.kannel.org/projects/kannel/repository/revisions/4749/diff/trunk/gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c > > So the people using debian should be aware of this, a working .deb with 1.5 > can be found here -> https://redmine.kannel.org/projects/kannel/files
Nice to know that. Has anyone tried that .deb package on Ubuntu Server? Does it work on it out-of-the-box? There is also an Arch Linux PKGBUILD on AUR for version 1.5.0: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kannel/ > By the way, since 1.5.0 has been pretty stable for at least one year > (according to the mailing list), are there any plans to retag the 1.5 as the > current stable? A little contribution on the topic: I've been using the 1.5.0 on my developemnt machine for about a year, so far I did not run into any problems related to that version. In fact, it seemed more stable than the 1.4.3 version, which keeps giving me: 2013-01-21 11:24:26 [1234] [6] ERROR: AT2[mycenter]: CMS ERROR: +CMS ERROR: 321 2013-01-21 11:24:26 [1234] [6] ERROR: AT2[mycenter]: CMS ERROR: Invalid memory index -> don't worry, just memory fragmentation. (321) That does not really cause malfunction, just mess up the log file a little. The AUR PKGBUILD has 13 votes (which on Arch Linux community indicates some kind of stability aprooval, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kannel/). So a lot people have been using and testing it for a while as just a percentage of people who actually use the package actually take time to vote. Regards, Rudy