Have you tried allowed-smsc-id and denied-smsc-id parameters in group=smsc?


On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Porter, Kelvin <kelvin.por...@h3net.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> The scenario is the following…
>
>
>
> I have customers that are sending HTTP requests to the SMSBox instance to
> initiate the sending of MT messages.  Depending on the intended destination
> of those messages (i.e., the to/receiver number),  I need to direct the
> message to one set of SMSC links or the other in the BearerBox.  The
> application performing the HTTP requests does not have any way of
> determining the set of numbers that need to go to a particular SMSC.  So, I
> am looking for a way to configure the SMSBox so that the SMSC is specified
> for certain MT destinations.
>
>
>
> In the opensmppbox, I would use the smsc-route option to set which SMSC
> was specified before it was sent to the bearerbox.  I am looking for
> equivalent functionality.  Have I overlooked something or is the
> functionality, not there?
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Kelvin R. Porter
>
>
>
> *From:* ha...@aeon.pk [mailto:ha...@aeon.pk]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:48 AM
> *To:* Porter, Kelvin
> *Cc:* users@kannel.org
> *Subject:* Re: SMSC-ID routing based on to/from on SMSBox?
>
>
>
> Can you explain your scenario with an example please? Would be easier to
> understand what you need.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Porter, Kelvin <kelvin.por...@h3net.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am writing to insure that I have not overlooked an option.  In my
> application, I have a need to specify SMSC based on where the message is
> being sent to (the users will not specify the smsc in the HTTP request).
>  Basically, I need to insure some MT destinations are treated differently
> that the others, independent of what is specified in the request.  I have
> looked at the source and it does not appear that this functionality is
> implemented.  Have I missed something?
>
>
>
> I am looking for something akin to the “smsc-route” option in the
> opensmppbox.  I may attempt to splice in this code from the opensmppbox, if
> I must.  Is there any interest in this functionality?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Kelvin R. Porter
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to