On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Otandeka Simon Peter <sotand...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > What is your debug level set to? > Just share those bearerbox logs and kannel conf (you can hash out the > important fields) > > I cannot set it to debug level because of the high traffic volume. I'm working on log-level=1 Can't I get a generic list of cases where kannel would mark an sms as failed? This should have been mentioned in the userguide btw... > @sotandeka > > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:32 AM, [Digital^Dude] ® < > millennium....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The source/destination address is correct. SMPP link is stable and it >> didn't throttle at the time the submit_sm was made. The same sms body, >> source, destination is made after every 30 minutes. >> But it failed once. Bearerbox have pretty much nothing to say except >> "Failed Send SMS" and the standard details of a correct "Sent SMS". >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Otandeka Simon Peter < >> sotand...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Please share your bearerbox logs. >>> There are many reasons as to why an SMS would fail. Most probable reason >>> is a invalid source address. >>> >>> >>> @sotandeka >>> +256 716 801 124 >>> Senior Programmer in VAS Mobile services, ERP, Health and Web-based >>> Systems. >>> Experienced Linux System Administrator and Open Source Developer. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:32 AM, [Digital^Dude] ® < >>> millennium....@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Can anyone shed some light on the possible reasons why bearerbox would >>>> mark an sms as FAILED? >>>> >>>> Does it fail it when an smsc doesn't send submit_sm ack? >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>> >>> >> >
