Hi Lori,

I have created a new issue in your github issue tracker as requested
(issue 7).

Best Regards,
Paris

On 26/1/2012 14:19, Lori Jakab wrote:
> Hi Paris,
>
> On 01/26/12 12:22, Paris Charalampou wrote:
>> Hi *,
>>
>> When a host(hostA) with ip address tries to communicate with the EID
>> of mobile node(hostB) with RLOC on the same subnet as hostA, all
>> replies from mobile node are not sent to the PxTR but directly to
>> nodeA, encapsulated in lisp packets. Since hostA is not in a lisp site
>> nor is lisp-aware, packets are dropped. The only way to by-pass the
>> issue is by removing the static route from hostB for the subnet of its
>> RLOC.
>> I am not sure that these packets should be encapsulated to lisp. But
>> even if they are encapsulated I think that lispmob should forward them
>> to PxTR (as in the workaround) and not on LAN.
> Thanks for reporting this issue.
>
> I think the correct solution is not to remove the static route, but
> instead to not encapsulate at all towards non-LISP destinations that are
> on the same subnet as any of the active RLOCs of the MN. We will look
> into this.
>
> Can you please file an issue in our Github issue tracker (no milestone):
> https://github.com/LISPmob/lispmob/issues
>
> Regards,
> -Lori
>
>> Paris
>>
>>  

Reply via email to