Hola Alberto,
Thank you. 
I will play around with it.
I am really longing for the multihoming and NAT capabilities.
Since I have a multihomed WAN connection this would be a nice solution. 
How about the OWRT port is there already  multihoming supported.
I'd like to flash one of my linksys boxes.
For the OWRT I would need other connect credencials ? 

Gracias
Stefan



Am 25.02.2013 um 14:03 schrieb Alberto Rodríguez-Natal <[email protected]>:

> Hola Stefan,
> 
> I'm glad to hear that everything is working now :D. 
> 
> Since it seems that your problem was related with the sysctl configuration, 
> I'm going to update the README file to clarify this to future users. In 
> general, LISPmob users should have rp_filter disabled and IP forwarding 
> enabled in their /etc/sysctl.conf files. Right now this is only mention in 
> the OpenWRT section.
> 
> Regarding the latency impact, the LISP paradigm induces some minimal latency 
> (due to the encap-decap process), but the latency increment you are facing is 
> mostly because of the use of proxies. The path to reach non-LISP sites goes 
> through a PETR and a PITR. You should see less latency increment when pinging 
> LISP sites.
> 
> Contact the list again if you experiment any other issue ;)
> 
> Cheers,
> Alberto
> 
> On 22 February 2013 19:22, Stefan Sachse <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hola Alberto,
> Looks like its working now.
> What I was noticing is that it has a big impact on latency. So my ping times 
> went up from 20 ms to ~ 350 ms. Is this normal ?
> 
> Gracias
> 
> Stefan
> 
> Am 22.02.2013 um 15:21 schrieb Alberto Rodríguez-Natal <[email protected]>:
> 
> > Hola Stefan,
> >
> > Despite that error, everything else is working? That error could be normal 
> > with that version of LISPmob if the OS is trying to send a IPv6 packet :P
> >
> > Saludos!
> > Alberto
> 
> 

Reply via email to