thanks albert

new few questions

1- my openwrt router use LAN 192.168.10.1 and my PBX is in static IP
192.168.10.150. in config with EID-prefix it would not be anymore valid the
192.168.10.1 but the EID-prefix assigned by you ? or I can still have my
192.168.10.xxx

2- when config is done. I suppouse LISPD does not run by default but need
to put a command in order to enable/ disable..... what would be the command
to enable/disable ?

3-
in the dummy config you share it, I saw address like 3.3.3.3,  4.4.4.4
  this should be subsitute with the EID-Prefix provisioning data or should
remain as is ?

4-your dummy config is only for xTR ? is the most common mode for normal
uses an multihoming? advantages of this vs  RTR & MN  and advantages of RTR
and MN modes?  and in what scenarios should be used each one.

5-the sponsors members of this project. has directly connected their
databases, minning etc to this projects or they only support this with
infrastructure, hardware, software. H.R. and the project is independtly,
self dependable of new code and opensource from the sponsors member ?

6-this is a beta network. it is planed to charge $ after for the
EID-prefixes ? if yes what about the beta lisps users ?

thanks again albert : )

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Jose Collin <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks so much for the answers. and thanks for the EID prefix.
> I have other questions
>
> 1-LISP for openwrt is available for AA 12.09 in particular to tl-wr740n
> and tl-mr3420 both are atheros a7xxx I check with opkg update for lispd and
> it appears to be version 3.xxx
>
> 2- how about security ? it is secure the communications ?
>
> 3- I usually use in my openwrt DnsCRYPT (dnscrypt-proxy) can exists with
> LISP ?
>
> 4-with my new EID prefix can have and use my 3 wan interfaces ? you said
> at some point that withou EID it would be used only one interface and other
> would behave as backup interfaces ( i would like to use all my interfaces
> WANS to do multihoming
>
> 5- it is possible to use at full all wan interfaces with a weight of 100
> each at same time ? or should be the totals wans 100 and from there make
> like  wan1 weight 70 wan2 weigh 20 and wan3 weight 10 ?
>
> 6-what could be the consequences using version 5.xx LISP without NAT.  i
> asked because I have connected to openwrt a PBX (freeSwitch) local and my
> phones are local.  plus I have 2 ip cameras  ( my external wan ip for all
> wans are dynamic )
>
> 7- LISP make my openwrt and clients faster, and more fail tolerance ? I
> suppouse for example if I have connection to a TV stream and the wan that
> is used at that moment lose connection... then with LISP automatic will
> still using the connection with the other wans ? and no break of internet
> link with tv stream ? ZERO down time ?
>
> 8- LISP can help to connect to my cameras by remote android phone with
> dynamic IP updater like no-ip.org ?
>
> 9- I suppouse that EID-Prefix IP is hosted in LISPmod Servers, this make
> faster and avoid down time ? security ?
> could you tell some of the advantages with this ?
>
> 10- thanks thanks so much for your fast answers, and your attentions. you
> are very kind
>
> thanks
> inquba
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Jose Collin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> HI. I want to try LISPd in my openwrt router CC chaos calmer 15.05
>>
>> I have Buffallo WZR-1750DHP router with openwrt,  I install LISPD by opkg
>> update, opkg install lispd
>>
>> my openwrt router is not atheros ar71x but (BCM4708) kernel version
>> 3.18.20
>>
>> I would like to use LISPD as I want MULTIHOMING I have 3 wan phisical
>> interfaces in router isolated as vlans
>>
>> so I have some questions and hope you can help me..
>>
>> 1- LISPD multihoming add bandwidth from all my wans?  ex wan=
>> 12mbpsDOWN/2mbpsUP
>> wan2 = 7mbpsDown/3mbpsUP wan3 = 10mbpsDown/4mpbsUP  so these 3 would add
>> the bandwidth like bonding and have 29mbpsDown/9mpsUP ???
>>
>> 2-I install the version 4.1 of LISPD in openwrt that was in the update
>> software so with this version I would have multihoming enable ?
>>
>> 3- per automatic config is recomended to put this
>> add the following lines to `/etc/sysctl.conf`. Remember to
>> reboot your system after adding these lines.
>>
>>     net.ipv4.conf.default.rp_filter=0
>>     net.ipv4.conf.all.rp_filter=0
>>     net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
>>     net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1
>>
>> but my openwrt LISPD version is diferent here how it is NOTE that it is
>> not rp_filter=0  but arp_ignore=1 and what should I put here 0 or 1 ?
>> default is 1
>> and note2 instead of all.rp_filter=0  it said all.arp_ignore=1
>>
>> kernel.panic=3
>> net.ipv4.conf.default.arp_ignore=1
>> net.ipv4.conf.all.arp_ignore=1
>> net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
>> net.ipv4.icmp_echo_ignore_broadcasts=1
>> net.ipv4.icmp_ignore_bogus_error_responses=1
>> net.ipv4.igmp_max_memberships=100
>> net.ipv4.tcp_ecn=0
>> net.ipv4.tcp_fin_timeout=30
>> net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_time=120
>> net.ipv4.tcp_syncookies=1
>> net.ipv4.tcp_timestamps=1
>> net.ipv4.tcp_sack=1
>> net.ipv4.tcp_dsack=1
>>
>> net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding=1
>> net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1
>>
>> net.netfilter.nf_conntrack_acct=1
>>
>> 4- It said that I should add all my interfaces before activating, so my
>> question is how I put the interfaces and how to set routes ?
>>
>> could you set this for me.. since I am very newbie with this ... here my
>> data for interfaces
>> NOTE: wan's are in order of importance for the metrics... wan is the most
>> important then wan2 and less important is wan3
>>
>> LAN= eth0.1 =ip 192.168.10.1
>> WAN= eth0.2 =ip is DHCP in 192.168.2.192/24
>> WAN2= eth0.200 =ip is DHCP in 192.168.11.192/24
>> WAN3= eth0.300 =ip is DHCP in 192.168.8.50/24
>>
>>
>> once made this the system would work out of the box ? or need something ?
>>
>> 5- I have use mwan3 and multiwan but it seems it only do load balancing
>> but not add the bandwidth of all wans.... what would be the advantages of
>> multihoming vs mwan3 and multiwan if any ?
>>
>> thanks so much in advance
>> Joseph Colin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
> ---------
> Jose A Colin G
>



-- 


---------
Jose A Colin G

Reply via email to