Murthy E-G19462 wrote: > Hans, > > Sorry I missed out responding to this mail. At any time, only the active > controller > Reads the pssv_spcn_list file and Standby controller gets populated with > configuration info > by Active controller using MBCSv. > > If switchover/Failover happens Because Standby already has information, > it will proceed to provide > service. > > In a scenario where we are second time rebooting (power on), and we have > a scenario where previous standby > Needs to be active, then it reads from the it's pssv_spcn_list > (currently XML) and builds the system.
Thanks but, pssv_spcn_list is not stored on the replicated partition. If we store pssv_spcn_list on the replicated partition too, then the new active controller will also boot from PSS => consistent behaviour. Isn't that good or what is the reason that you have not choosen not to share pssv_spcn_list between the controllers? Regards, Hans > > This is how we envisioned. Are you facing any problem with this > behaviour? > > Regards > Murthy > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hans Feldt >>Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 5:21 PM >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: [Users] pssv_spcn_list attributes >> >>According to the controller rpm spec file, pssv_spcn_list is >>persistent but not shared. Is that correct? > > > According the expected behavious, this is correct. > >>What happens e.g. when two controller are started (cold/power >>on) with enough time between them to allow the first >>controller to write 'PSS' to this file. From what source will >>the second controller then boot XML or PSS? > > > See response above. > >>Regards, >>Hans >>_______________________________________________ >>Users mailing list >>[email protected] >>http://list.opensaf.org/maillist/listinfo/users >> > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://list.opensaf.org/maillist/listinfo/users
