Thanks for starting a new thread.
If the application configuration XML file is not proper then the avsv demo apllication should have failed but it didn't.Demo application was successful.
Rgds,
Nirmala
--- On Tue, 6/11/07, Gudipalli S.-G19449 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Gudipalli S.-G19449 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: application componenet not instantiating.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [email protected]
Date: Tuesday, 6 November, 2007, 10:35 AM
Hi Nirmala,Can you please ask questions on a new mailing thread. I did that for you in this case.openSAF AvSv is based on SAF AMF spec.If your component is not instantiated when openSAF was started that means your applicationconfiguration in the XMl might not be correct please verify that.RegardsSugadeesh
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of nirmala devi
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 10:23 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Users] Component health checking in OpenSAF
Hi,
I have a problem while executing the testcases for AvSv.
Actually the component is already defined and it should comeup when the service is started if i am not wrong.
But in my cases when i start the service and run the testcase it fails showing the error where the component is not defined.
When we define the component using setenv command, then the initialisation API's works fine, but registration is failing with the result as SA_AIS_ERR_LIBRARY.
Anyone faced the same problem.
and also the health monitoring API's are failing because the proxy component not set.
Whats the format for it.?
--- On Mon, 5/11/07, Gudipalli S.-G19449 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:From: Gudipalli S.-G19449 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Users] Component health checking in OpenSAF
To: Mathivanan Np-G19859 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hans Feldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, shankar reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected]
Date: Monday, 5 November, 2007, 5:14 PMHi Andras, You can also demo health check failure by causing a infinite loop in your application. This AVA down fast detection is done for only the registered process of The component. So if you want to do training have a component with 2 processes One the registered process which doesn't do health check and the other process Should start health check. Then when the none registered process is killed The health check failure will only cause the recovery to happen. Regards Sugadeesh > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Mathivanan Np-G19859 > Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 4:11 PM > To: Hans Feldt; shankar reddy > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Users] Component health checking in OpenSAF > > > The "AvA Down" message is originated from MDS when a > component(mds dest) goes down. > > Regards, > Mathi. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hans Feldt > > Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 3:37 PM > > To: shankar reddy > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Users] Component health checking in OpenSAF > > > > shankar reddy wrote: > > > Andras, > > > Yes. It is the expected behaviour in OpenSAF, because when the > > > application is killed then SCAP (AMF) process receives AVA > > down (Agent > > > Down) message. Then AMF restarts the component if it is the > > > restartable component. This another mechanism apart from > > HealthCheck. > > > > Is this "AVA Down" message originated from TIPC? > > > > Regards, > > Hans > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > Shankar > > > > > > > > > */Andras Kovi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I have created a simple application that runs on a > > controller node > > > and consists of only one component. The component healthchecks > > > interval is two seconds. Everything works fine, I get > the HCs in > > > time. But when I kill the component process directly by > > issuing a > > > pkill, OpenSAF restarts the component immediately as if > > there was > > > some other mean that monitored the process, other than > > the HC. Is > > > this true? As far as I know only passive monitoring is > > entitled for > > > such functionality in the AMF but I did not start > > anything like that. > > > > > > Ok, most probably this is a very good supportive > > functionality, but > > > it can cause some problems, if you are creating educative > > > demonstrations. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Andras > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Users mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://list.opensaf.org/maillist/listinfo/users > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -- > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Users mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://list.opensaf.org/maillist/listinfo/users > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://list.opensaf.org/maillist/listinfo/users > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.opensaf.org/maillist/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://list.opensaf.org/maillist/listinfo/users
Why delete messages? Unlimited storage is just a click away.
Now you can chat without downloading messenger. Click here to know how.
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://list.opensaf.org/maillist/listinfo/users
