> > IMHO, the later case may be considered ok depending upon a node's design. A > CPU-bound infinite loop can significantly starve other user-level processes > in the node. Such a starvation of other user-level processes (leading to > intra-node healthcheck timeouts, say) can actually be considered a fault. >
There's absolutely no reason why a non-realtime process should be able to starve the heartbeating mechanism of an HA cluster simply by going CPU bound. I'll see if I can get the report from the HP team sent to the users list. Chad
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://list.opensaf.org/maillist/listinfo/users
