On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 10:28 -0300, Luigi Castro Cardeles wrote: > 2010/3/9 Roberto Ragusa <m...@robertoragusa.it>: > > Luigi Castro Cardeles wrote: > >> 2010/3/9 Mikkel <mik...@infinity-ltd.com>: > > > >>> slow speed > >>> high speed > >>> full speed > > > >> so: > >> low-speed - uhci > >> full-speed - ohci > >> high-speed - ehci > > > > When the USB group created the 2.0 specifications it made > > a good effort to confuse "good speed" (480Mbit/s) with > > "awful speed" (12Mbit/s) devices, so to manage to sell > > all the ancient stuff by putting a USB2.0 label on them. > > > > This thread clearly demonstrates how successful they were. > > :-( > > > > -- > > Roberto Ragusa mail at robertoragusa.it > > -- > > users mailing list > > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > > > but using the same external hd on windows is faster then on linux... > at that point, i am trying to understand that :D > the device is: philips case sde3275fc/97 > still struggling with that.
It's likely that the disk came with a special driver for Windows, whereas the Linux version is using a generic driver. I'd guess the answer is probably in the Windows driver code, but of course it will be binary and proprietary so it's of no use to anyone. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
