On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 4:36 PM, psmith <psm...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 01/04/10 23:44, Craig White wrote: > > > I do have faith that Fedora governance is > > independent of Red Hat. > > > > Craig > > > > > > > you are joking right? fedora is just a testing ground for redhat (think > selinux, pulseaudio, abrt etc etc), and the governance is full of > @redhat.com people > > You know how it is, some people like to see things their way. > I, for one, have no objection with Fedora being used as a test bench for RHEL: if RH invests in Fedora, it should get a return on investment. This is normal business. OTOH, I'm really glad that there is absolutely no problem at RH/Fedora (RHF) since, after checking insiders tradings at Yahoo, if there was a problem, I would truly have no idea on how to solve it. I can't figure how the figures I see there are compatible with developers working for Red Hat for free... Ooops! I meant "contributing their work" for free. So, no problem and no solution: everything is fine. Meanwhile, back on the farm, Mark Shuttleworth pays his developers and doesn't get a cent back... for now.
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
