On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:31 PM, James Hogarth <james.hoga...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 19 Apr 2016 18:25, "Patrick O'Callaghan" <pocallag...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Apparently at the time I changed from NAT to Bridged networking, >> which fixed it (don't ask me why). However removing the redundant >> file seems to be the way to go. It's now back to NAT. > > Ah when using bridges IIRC libvirt doesn't manage it as there's no > dnsmasq for it to handle... So the expectation (and normal thing on > hypervisor servers) is to create and manage the bridge with the > NM/network service and then point the guest at that bridge in the > configuration through libvirtd.
You can set up a bridge with libvirt rather than with ifcfg-* or NM but still use a bridged network for the VMs. It has the merit of keeping the VM networking within libvirt's realm, just like for natted or routed networks. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
