Patrick O'Callaghan writes:
On Fri, 2016-11-25 at 11:08 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:> Wondering if all upgrades with selinux enabled are broken, or just something> with this particular laptop. This doesn't look like a system-specific> failure to me, but if all upgrades with enforcing selinux blow up like this,> I would've expected a lot of noise in here, by now… More details in bug > 1398696.My system has been enforcing for at least the last 5 versions (possibly more), and I had no problem with this.
What output do you get from: ls -alZd /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade On the one with the problem I get:drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root unconfined_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s0 233472 Nov 25 10:31 /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade
Now, another one of my laptops shows:drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root unconfined_u:object_r:rpm_var_lib_t:s0 221184 Nov 23 16:09 system-upgrade
However that laptop was already running in permissive mode. Still, according to rpm:
file /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade is not owned by any packageAfter rmdir-ing and mkdir-ing /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade its selinux context is changed to unconfined_u:object_r:rpm_var_lib_t:s0, so I think that's where the problem was. Unclear how the former selinux context was what it was.
pgpoHccMsScwd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
