Hi,all. I meet this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445817
When I run dnf upgrade, it faild: Cannot download 'https://codecs.fedoraproject.org/openh264/26/x86_64/': repomd.xml GPG signature verification error: Bad GPG signature. Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora-cisco-openh264' So, I tried to verify repomd.xml manually, the result is: $gpg --list-keys $gpg --import /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-26-x86_64 gpg: key 64DAB85D: public key "Fedora 26 Primary (26) <fedora-26-primary@ fedoraproject.org>" imported gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: imported: 1 (RSA: 1) $gpg --list-keys /home/rlu/.gnupg/pubring.gpg ---------------------------- pub 4096R/64DAB85D 2016-09-09 uid Fedora 26 Primary (26) <fedora-26-primary@ fedoraproject.org> $gpg --verify repomd.xml.asc repomd.xml gpg: Signature made Sat 25 Mar 2017 02:41:50 AM CST using RSA key ID 64DAB85D gpg: Good signature from "Fedora 26 Primary (26) <fedora-26-primary@ fedoraproject.org>" gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: E641 850B 77DF 4353 78D1 D7E2 812A 6B4B 64DA B85D I think this is a success result. But why dnf is failed? -- Robert Lu <robberp...@gmail.com> About me: http://about.me/RobberPhex
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org