On 4/19/19 1:39 PM, Phil Wyett wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 13:09 -0400, sean darcy wrote:
FC29. I have a server for video encoding. I use x264, which I keep
updated to the most recent git packaaged in an rpm.
rpm -q x264-libs
x264-libs-0.157-0.20190331.fc29.x86_64
I then rebuild all the packages that depend on x264, including
avidemux-libs. I just rebuild on my machine, without chaging the
version, since the version hasn't changed, it's just linked to the new
x264 version.
rpm -q avidemux-libs
avidemux-libs-2.7.3-1.fc29.x86_64
But dnf want to replace my rebuild version, with the version for the repo:
dnf upgrade --refresh
..............
Problem 1: package avidemux-libs-2.7.3-1.fc29.x86_64 requires
libx264.so.155()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both
x264-libs-0.155-2.20180806git0a84d98.fc29.x86_64 and
x264-libs-0.157-0.20190331.fc29.x86_64
I don't want to bump the avidemux-libs version, since I want to know
when a new one is available. I don't want to keep adding "-x avidemux.."
Why does dnf want to replace the installed package ? How does it even
know it's not the same package as the repo ?
sean
Hi,
You do need to bump in some way. You can...
Original: avidemux-libs-2.7.3-1
Your rebuild: avidemux-libs-2.7.3-1.1
Any new version from repo i.e. will be -2 or above and update as normal if/when
released.
Regards
Phil
Good idea, and it worked, thanks.
sean
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org