On 2020-02-21 11:17, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > This exact scenario is why I don't believe the GNOME Spin should have ever > been allowed to effectively disable the firewall with their absurd > FedoraWorkstation firewall zone.
What do you find absurd about the FedoraWorkstation zone? [root@f31g ~]# firewall-cmd --info-zone=FedoraWorkstation FedoraWorkstation (active) target: default icmp-block-inversion: no interfaces: enp1s0 sources: services: dhcpv6-client mdns samba-client ssh vnc-server ports: protocols: masquerade: no forward-ports: source-ports: icmp-blocks: rich rules: [root@f31g ~]# firewall-cmd --info-zone=public public target: default icmp-block-inversion: no interfaces: sources: services: dhcpv6-client mdns ssh vnc-server ports: protocols: masquerade: no forward-ports: source-ports: icmp-blocks: rich rules: The only difference between public and FedoraWorkstation seems to be the inclusion of samba-client. -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
