On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 17:59:51 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 2020-04-22 16:48, Frank Elsner wrote:
> > Hi community,
> >
> > I've found the following strangeness on my regulary updated Fedora 31:
> >
> > file /boot/System.map-5.4.14-200.fc31.x86_64 is not owned by any package
> > file /boot/.vmlinuz-5.4.14-200.fc31.x86_64.hmac is not owned by any package
> > file /boot/config-5.4.14-200.fc31.x86_64 is not owned by any package
> > file /boot/initramfs-5.4.14-200.fc31.x86_64.img is not owned by any package
> > file /boot/vmlinuz-5.4.14-200.fc31.x86_64 is not owned by any package
> > file 
> > /boot/loader/entries/e731a672c5634346bf52bf901e274268-5.4.14-200.fc31.x86_64.conf
> >  is not owned by any package
> > file /usr/share/licenses/kernel-core/COPYING-5.4.14 is not owned by any 
> > package
> > file /usr/share/doc/kernel-keys/5.4.14-200.fc31.x86_64 is not owned by any 
> > package
> > file /usr/lib/modules/5.4.14-200.fc31.x86_64 is not owned by any package
> >
> > How could this happen? Is it save to remove remove?
> >
> 
> Well, if you don't have a 5.4.14-200 kernel installed it would be fine to 
> delete them.

Coming bach to an old case ... Can I do it by executing 

/bin/kernel-install remove 5.4.14-200.fc31.x86_64 
/lib/modules/5.4.14-200.fc31.x86_64/vmlinuz  ?


--Frank
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to