On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 04:37, Erik P. Olsen <epod...@gmail.com> wrote:

> What am I missing if I remove flatpak?
>

Apps that have the same versions and features across multiple distros,
oddball apps that you would otherwise have to build from source, legacy
apps using tools that are being removed from many distros (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1737933).

In many fields, there are projects that involve individual researchers
spread around the globe, working in different institutions with different
linux distros and different update schedules.  Flatpaks provide a way for
all members of a project to use a common version and configuration of key
apps.

Developers are a scarce resource for open source projects.  These days,
much of the heavy lifting is done by people involved with large scale
processing.   This has resulted in decisions that aren't welcomed by
individuals with personal systems (systemd, homed), deprecation of older
versions of popular tools (python2), and less attention to desktop apps and
their supporting libraries that aren't widely used by the large-scale
community.   You see this effect in the time it takes to deal with
different bug reports.  Native ports of apps that aren't used in
large-scale processing may be slow to appear and have reduced
functionality due to messing support libraries.

>From an app developer's perspective, flatpaks reduce the headaches sorting
out differences between distros and releases.   This means fewer bug
reports of the form "your app works on distro A, but fails on distro B".

-- 
George N. White III
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to