On 2020-08-21 10:03, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > On 2020-08-20 18:34, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 2020-08-21 09:03, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: >>> On 2020-08-20 16:43, Ed Greshko wrote: >>>> On 2020-08-21 07:33, Doug McGarrett wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 8/20/20 7:15 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >>>>>> On 2020-08-21 06:50, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: >>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I need PDF Editor that is Dynamic XFA friendly. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And example file would be: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://tax.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/taxnvgov/Content/Forms/Sales_and_Use_Tax_Return_07-01-11(1)1(2).pdf >>>>>>> >>>>>>> PDF Studio has no Dynamic XFA support and Master >>>>>>> PDF Editor only has limited support (fields won't >>>>>>> update). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And I don't mind paying for it, IF IT WORKS! >>>>>> Use google to search "xfa support linux" >>>>>> >>>>>> Hint: The first suggestion works. (Well, at least the first one I was >>>>>> presented). >>>>>> >>>>> That search comes up with a deb format file. If you add "rpm" to that, >>>>> you get Master PDF Editor. >>>>> Is it possible that there is a version of PDF Editor that is more recent >>>>> than the google reply? >>>>> I haven't tried this lately, so I don't know what editor I used "back >>>>> when" or if I just downloaded >>>>> the form, filled it out in ink and mailed it! (PDF Editor has just come >>>>> out with an update. Maybe >>>>> that works?) >>>>> >>>> >>>> I too am proponent of trying things for oneself. >>>> >>>> The download of the tar version of Master PDF editor works fine. The rpm >>>> package has an issue. >>> >>> I am not having issue with Master PDF Editor's RPM and have been using >>> Master PDF for years. >>> >>> The form I posted, it does not update the totals correctly. >> >> For the short time I played with the form I found no errors updating the >> totals. > > Try sticking things in column F
I did... 01F 5000 02F 123.23 05F 6000 14F 525 17F 666 Totals to 12314.23 > > >> >> It gets called just fine from the menu or desktop file as those do reference >> the shell script which does >> use the library path variable. yuck. > > It has to do with private Qt libraries > Yes, I know. This very thing was talked about a while ago in a thread about pdfs. The tar file executable uses the system supplied Qt Libraries just fine. So, if one wants to package an application but include Qt libs because they want to be sure it will run they should be able to detect if the private libs are needed or not and call the appropriate binary. So, like firefox, the executable called from the command line should be a script to do what is needed. -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
