On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 19:00:30 +0200, Kostas Sfakiotakis wrote: > [root@Orion ~]# dnf repoquery --whatrequires libcpuid > > Last metadata expiration check: 0:52:55 ago on Tue 29 Dec 2020 06:01:13 > PM EET. > cpu-x-0:4.0.1-5.fc33.x86_64 > i-nex-0:7.6.1-4.fc33.x86_64 > i-nex-0:7.6.1-6.fc33.x86_64 > libcpuid-devel-0:0.4.1-3.fc33.i686 > libcpuid-devel-0:0.4.1-3.fc33.x86_64 > libcpuid-devel-0:0.5.0-1.fc33.i686 > libcpuid-devel-0:0.5.0-1.fc33.x86_64 > > The only package from the above that i was using was cpu-x ( deleted it > since ) , i am not using i-nex , so by deleting the cpu-x package i was > indeed getting rid off the > problem you mentioned with libcpuid . That's what i was trying to say .
You had written "[...] and then reinstall or abandon the cpu-x package for the moment [...]", which prompted me to point out that reinstalling the package would not fix anything, since it would not fix the dependency breakage. Of course, if you don't need cpu-x at all, you can keep it removed. Reinstalling is what would not fix anything with regard to the libcpuid test update breakage. _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
