On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 3:14 PM Roger Heflin <rogerhef...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I usually add a bs=4k or bs=16k or a bs=256k when using dd so the
> blocksize is larger.  That usually makes it quite a bit  faster.


fdisk shows block size

>
>
> And if you background the dd you can use "vmstat 1" and the bi/bo
> columns tell you the actual disk io rates, and you can use that to
> reliably estimate.


Elderly rescue CD’s have busybox, which provides nmeter.    Fdisk gives
values for logical and physical block size, but those may be fictional.

 % doas fdisk -l /dev/sdb1

Disk /dev/sdb1: 1.91 TiB, 2100425654272 bytes, 4102393856 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes

On the elderly iMac, logical and physical were both 512.



>
> Default is 512 and does not align with most (all?) underlying physical
> devices block sizes and may cause various layers extra work and take
> much longer.
>

I have done experiments preparatory to using dd to clone a box of disks.
Modern storage devices are more complicated and network speed means
sneakernet is no longer needed.

-- 
George N. White III
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to