On 12/13/22 20:39, Robert Nichols wrote:
On 12/13/22 6:10 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 12/13/22 15:28, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
However qcow also allows compression, sparse files,
encryption and copy-on-write snapshots (COW, hence the
name) [...]
This is not meant to detract from your well-made point that
the qcow2 format provides many benefits over raw filesystem
images. :)
Tangentially, the qemu-img(1) man page says of the
encryption support:
The use of encryption in qcow and qcow2 images is
considered to be flawed by modern cryptography
standards, suffering from a number of design problems:
[...]
Use of qcow / qcow2 encryption is thus strongly
discouraged. Users are recommended to use an alternative
encryption technology such as the Linux dm-crypt / LUKS
system.
And if you can't back it up, it is ...
I really don't understand what the issue with restoring a qcow2 file
might be. As far as the host is concerned, it's just a file that
contains a binary blob. Dumping and restoring such a file should be no
different from doing the same with any other file containing an
arbitrary arrangement of ONEs and ZEROs.
"dump" and "restore" are specific utilities for exporting and recreating
an ext filesystem. They can't work on a qcow file because they're
expecting a disk partition or equivalent. e.g. a raw file would work as
well.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
