Tim wrote:
> Adam Mercer wrote:
>> I've been using some of the earlier 115.x builds that showed up
>> for F38 witout issue. This morning I built 115.2.2, from the F39
>> source RPM using mock, and so far it's been running without issue...
>
>Well, I might disagree. Your message was extremely scrambled by the
>GPG/PGP process.
>
>What I see is mostly unhandled MIME coming through raw. Headers in the
>message body, mangled body content, undecoded signature MIME content,
>then two PGP attachments, etc.
The problem could be your Evolution. Adam's message seemed just fine
when I saw it using exmh.
--
Dave Close, Compata, Irvine CA +1 714 434 7359
d...@compata.com dhcl...@alumni.caltech.edu
The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts agree,
is by accident. That's where we come in; we're computer professionals.
We cause accidents. -- Nathaniel Borenstein
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
