> On 15 Nov 2023, at 16:18, ToddAndMargo via users > <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > I had the same as you until today when I did a `dnf upgrade`. > Then all hell broke loose and librpmio and librpm got upgraded > to 10.
On my f38 system there is no .10 # dnf install /usr/lib64/librpm.so.10 Last metadata expiration check: 3:43:48 ago on Wed 15 Nov 2023 13:16:33 GMT. No match for argument: /usr/lib64/librpm.so.10 Error: Unable to find a match: /usr/lib64/librpm.so.10 What do you get when you do the following commands: rpm -ql rpm-libs dnf list installed rpm-libs This is what I see: [root@armf38 ~]# rpm -ql rpm-libs /usr/lib/.build-id /usr/lib/.build-id/1a /usr/lib/.build-id/1a/eb222329842e6fb62cf39efa961713445a579e /usr/lib/.build-id/7b /usr/lib/.build-id/7b/c93dcd84e2911ac9ce66e44543f2ece1d30a53 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9.4.0 /usr/lib64/librpmio.so.9 /usr/lib64/librpmio.so.9.4.0 /usr/lib64/rpm-plugins [root@armf38 ~]# dnf list installed rpm-libs Installed Packages rpm-libs.aarch64 4.18.1-3.fc38 @updates [root@armf38 ~]# I am especially interested in the repo that your .so.10 came from. My .so.9 came from @updates. Barry
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
