On 24 Feb 2024 at 16:55, Sam Varshavchik wrote:

From:   Sam Varshavchik <mr...@courier-mta.com>
To:             Community support for Fedora users 
<users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Subject:        Re: tigervnc server configuration limitation
Date sent:      Sat, 24 Feb 2024 16:55:05 -0500
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 
<users@lists.fedoraproject.org>

> Michael D. Setzer II via users writes:
> 
> > As I stated. I've found Turbo VNC seems to work very well.
> > At my home, I've got a notebook, and use it to vnc into 6 other
> > Fedora 39 machines, and two windows machines in house.
> 
> I hear you. I'm not married to tigervnc, just not sure if trying to get  
> turbovnc installed and set up will be more or less work, given that, it  
> appears, it's not in Fedora, but in an external repository, with everything  
> that that means.
> 
> The issue is not with tigervnc itself, but with its packaging. My  
> recollection of the early days of Fedora is that the guiding principle was  
> to stay close to upstream packaging. This is not happening anymore.
> 
> 

The repo file is:
cat TurboVNC.repo
[TurboVNC]
name=TurboVNC official RPMs
baseurl=https://packagecloud.io/dcommander/turbovnc/rpm_any/rpm_any/$bas
earch
repo_gpgcheck=1
gpgcheck=1
gpgkey=https://packagecloud.io/dcommander/turbovnc/gpgkey
       https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TurboVNC/repo/main/VGL-GPG-KEY
       
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TurboVNC/repo/main/VGL-GPG-KEY-1024
enabled=1
sslverify=1
sslcacert=/etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt
metadata_expire=6h
skip_if_unavailable=True

[TurboVNC-source]
name=TurboVNC official SRPMs
baseurl=https://packagecloud.io/dcommander/turbovnc/rpm_any/rpm_any/SRP
MS
repo_gpgcheck=1
gpgcheck=1
gpgkey=https://packagecloud.io/dcommander/turbovnc/gpgkey
       https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TurboVNC/repo/main/VGL-GPG-KEY
       
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TurboVNC/repo/main/VGL-GPG-KEY-1024
enabled=1
sslverify=1
sslcacert=/etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt
metadata_expire=6h
skip_if_unavailable=True

Used Tightvnc back in days of Redhat and a number of Fedora 
Core version, then they switch to the tigervnc and that worked for 
a long time, then stopped working if local login, with vnc using 
wayland/gnome 3. The xfce did work until Fedora 39, and then it 
stopped. The stopped supporting the vncserver option, and I could 
never get it to work even with xfce. So turbovnc was my only 
option. It has worked fine on my test machine, and now on all 
machines.

Well, hope you can get something to work either with tigervnc or 
turbovnc, but I tried and failed with tigervnc. It worked to 38, but 
39 made it impossible. So, looks like you have to do things the 
exact tigervnc way with systemd or out of luck.


+------------------------------------------------------------+
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired)     
 mailto:mi...@guam.net                            
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 mailto:msetze...@gmx.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins                        
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+------------------------------------------------------------+


--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to